Search Results

It is all our fault. This is superb... ...by the BBC too.

This morning I had the pleasure of interviewing Carrie Madej. Few have such a 360' view on the pandemic, hydrogels and all that is happening with UN agenda 2030 and the dystopian transhumanism future. The interview is nearly an hour long and is still being cut. Meanwhile, here is a glimpse. WATCH HERE>>> To make sure you don't miss any of the interviews, join the Not On The Beeb newsletter for more stuff the BBC forgot... LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇 The Better Way Conference. Tickets are sold out but virtual tickets allowing lifetime access are still on sale. THE LAST TICKET? This is from an NOTB member One 'in person' ticket for the sold out Better Way Conference (for the full weekend) now available. Please contact litakhazaka@studiolk.co.uk for details. 50+ speakers, including: ● Dr Pierre Kory ● Mattias Desmet ● Andrew Bridgen ● James Corbett ● Vera Sharav ● Dr Jessica Rose ● Prof Norman Fenton ● Dr Tina Peers ● Patrick Holford ● Dan Astin-Gregory ● Derrick Broze ● Dr Zoë Harcombe ● Richard Vobes ● Robin Monotti ● Veronika Kyrylenko ● Clive de Carle ● Dr Paul Marik ● Dr Sarah Myhill ● Deanna McLeod ● Dr Simon Goddek ● Ramiro Romani ● Dr Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse ● Dr Wai Ching Lee ● Rain Trozzi ● Dr Reiner Fuellmich ● Mark Devlin ● Jemma Cooper ● B. Love ● Dr Marc Cohen ● Dr Beverly Rubik ● Kim Witczak ● Dr Dietrich Klinghardt ● Dr Atsuo Yanagisawa ● Laura Aboli ● Dr Carrie Madej ● Dr Sabine Hazan ● David Fleming ● Reggie Littlejohn ● Dr Meryl Nass ● Darren Deojee ● Fahrie Hassan ● Dr Marivic Villa ● Prof Olle Johansson ● Kathleen Burke ● Feisal Mansoor ● William Keyte ● Jan Wellmann ● Dr André Leu ● Dr Jeremy Birnstingl ● Alex Krainer ● Karen-Ruth Skolmli ● Stephanie Locricchio ● Melissa Ciummei ● Daisy Fretwell ● Rory Duff ● Debra Fry ● Dr Ramiz Ahmed-Man ● Emma Sron ● Christof Plothe, DO ● Shabnam Palesa Mohamad ● Dr Mark Trozzi ● Dr Tess Lawrie ● Master of Ceremonies Neil Oliver 🎟 Tickets: BetterWayConference.org LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

by Elhuyar Fundazioa Graphene is a diamagnetic material, this is, unable of becoming magnetic. However, a triangular piece of graphene is predicted to be magnetic. This apparent contradiction is a consequence of "magic" shapes in the structure of graphene flakes, which force electrons to "spin" easier in one direction. Triangulene is a triangular graphene flake, which possesses a net magnetic moment: it is a graphene nanometer-size magnet. This magnetic state opens fascinating perspectives on the use of these pure-carbon magnets in technology. However, the robust predictions of triangulene magnetism stumbled with the absence of clear experimental proofs, because the production of triangulene by organic synthesis methods in solution was difficult. The bi-radical character of this molecule caused it to be very reactive and difficult to fabricate, and the magnetism appears to be very elusive in those few successful cases. In a new study, published in Physical Review Letters, this challenge was revisited using a scanning tunneling microscope (STM). After assembling a triangular-like piece of graphene on a clean gold surface, high-resolution scanning tunneling spectroscopy measurements revealed that this compound has a net magnetic state characterized by a spin S=1 ground state and, therefore, that this molecule is a small, pure carbon paramagnet. These results are the first experimental demonstration of a high-spin graphene flake. The findings were further complemented with atomic manipulation steps of hydrogen-passivated triangulene side-products occasionally found in the experiment. By controlled removal of these additional hydrogen atoms in the experiments, the spin state of the flake could be modified from a closed-shell, doubly hydrogenated structure, to an intermediate S=1/2 spin state, and finally to the high-spin S=1 state of the ideal molecular structure. The experimental proof of a spin-state in the absence of a magnetic quantization axis (detectable by spin-polarized STM) or magnetic anisotropy (detectable by spin-flip inelastic tunneling spectroscopy) is not simple. In this work, the spin signature was obtained from the underscreened Kondo effect—an exotic version of the standard Kondo effect described in the 1960s—that can arise in high-spin systems. Its observation in a graphene flake on a metal has not been reported before and brings here novel insights to understanding spins interacting with surfaces. SOURCE : https://phys.org/news/2020-05-unraveling-magnetism-graphene-triangular-flake.html LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

It has been a sad week as we come to terms with the loss of international freedom fighter and advanced medical practitioner Dr Buttar. Many immediately suggested murder, while others responded with a knee-jerk reaction ‘puppetting’ the indoctrinated phrase calling these claims out as ‘conspiracy’. Could they be right? Of course, and we must remain open-minded. However, I hope everyone pauses for thought when a highly respected doctor feels the need to put the words, "I am of sound mind and not suicidal” on the public record–and then dies. Dr Buttar also made it clear during several recent interviews that he had been poisoned. What could be the motive? Dr Buttar’s work educating respected professionals alongside millions of the public to the true powers of real medicine, was a threat to the pharmaceutical companies. Nothing dents profits more seriously than a competitor with a superior product. Inferior products can outsell a superior product if sufficient resources are thrown at the marketing. The marketing campaign is sealed by controlling the news networks, ‘owning’ the sub-affiliate selling GPs and MDs and stifling all alternative voices. This has been the highly successful modus operandi of big pharma. When the narrative rose exponentially with the onset of the C19 plandemic, a list was drawn up called the Disinformation Dozen. These are from a US perspective, the top twelve most successful influencers contradicting the gov/pharma narrative via the powers of social media. Getting their message out warning of inferior products and educating of cheaper safer alternatives. Effectively, the list is the top twelve people in the USA threatening the narrative and billions in pharma’s profits. Dr Buttar was on this list. When Princess Diana was murdered, the reason was clear to anyone following the news closely as I had been doing. The whole of the British paparazzi seemed to be on the French Riveria snapping Diana and her lover Dodi Fayad on their yacht. I had read a small paragraph two days before, indicating a local nurse, who was touting £25k for an exclusive, was about to spill the beans on something major. I could think of no other story possible than her pregnancy. The abandonment of their holiday and their rush back to England fitted with this theory as a public announcement of an engagement was their only way out. So when someone knocked on my door and said “Di is dead” my reply was simple. “They got her then.” More importantly, just like Dr Buttar, Princess Diana said her life was in danger and predicted her own murder in a car 2 years before she died. It’s only those subject to the Western media that believe the car crash story. travel further afield and everyone from doctors to road cleaners realise the truth. Would the royal family, or those protecting them, let the line to the British throne be tainted by stepbrothers co-joining the Windsors and the infamous Egyptian Fayed family? The timing of Princess Dianna and Dodi’s murder was due to their imminent arrival and probable engagement announcement in the UK. If anyone wonders how an assassination plan could be put into place so quickly, it is believed a previous assassination plan destined for Yassar Arafat that had been archived when he changed his travel plans, was dusted off and used. (If you are interested in finding out more Keith Allen (the father of singer Lilly Allen) has made "Unlawful Killing'. Although I don't agree with all of it, it is the best documentary on Princess Diana's death. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2kOBo33QkA On hearing the rumours of murder, a friend asked the simple question, ‘But, why now?’ Was Dr Buttar's upcoming Advanced Medicine Conference the reason behind the timing of his death? Dr Buttar had lead the team organising the Advanced Medicine Conference that was die to take place this past weekend. A few days after his death earlier last week, they released this announcement. With deepest regret... "...With deepest regret, we are announcing the cancellation of the Advanced Medicine Conference which was scheduled for this Saturday, May 27th thru Monday, May 29th in St. Louis, MO. We understand and have a deep desire to honor Dr. Buttar's legacy, and he would likely want the conference to continue without him, however the family and staff has not yet had time to grieve, prepare funeral arrangements, arrange burial etc. So we feel there is just not adequate time or resources available to do justice to his legacy at this time. We apologize to those of you who have made plans to attend in person or virtually.  If you have purchased admission to the conference, it will be refunded to you in the next 24-48 hours. We appreciate your patience and understanding with this unfortunate situation..." Dr Buttar 0n Dr Ardis's podcast - 8th May In this interview Dr Buttar discusses the history of the Advanced Medical Conference and his previous poisoning. This video was posted on the 8th May This interview of Dr Buttar by Dr Ardis is an important watch to get an overview of the Advanced Medicine Conference and the general impact it had.. This is the description of the interview. "...Dr. Ardis interviews a hero, not only for the last three years through this pandemic, but one who has extended many, many lives and given hope to people all over the world, Dr. Rashid Buttar. God has given Dr. Buttar the gift of healing and you will learn about natural alternative therapies for treating and preventing cancer. Dr. Buttar discusses his 5th annual Advanced Medicine Conference in Kanas City, MO on Memorial Day weekend. Dr. Ardis and many others will be presenting incredible, life-saving information...." Dr Buttar warns CNN host that post jab, he might have a ticking time bomb inside him. Dr Buttar's last tweet Dr Buttar was discussing releasing pre-conference talks for his 5th Advanced Medicine Conference this coming weekend. He was looking to the future. He mentions his views on the possibility of other life forms within our other planets & galaxies. He shares exciting news 27mins in on Regenerative Agriculture progress and an exciting shift in humankind. He ends the message with "See you on the other side!" Please leave your comments under this post

It's clearly time to limit Big Pharma and save the planet! 😊 Big Pharma Emits More Greenhouse Gases Than The Automotive Industry by Jack Marley Rarely does mention of the pharmaceutical industry conjure up images of smoke stacks, pollution and environmental damage. Yet our recent study found the global pharmaceutical industry is not only a significant contributor to global warming, but it is also dirtier than the global automotive production sector. It was a surprise to find how little attention researchers have paid to the industry’s greenhouse gas emissions. Only two other studies had some relevance: one looked at the environmental impact of the U.S. health-care system and the other at the pollution (mostly water) discharged by drug manufacturers. Our study was the first to assess the carbon footprint of the pharma sector.. More polluting More than 200 companies represent the global pharmaceutical market, yet only 25 consistently reported their direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions in the past five years. Of those, only 15 reported their emissions since 2012. One immediate and striking result is that the pharmaceutical sector is far from green. We assessed the sector’s emissions for each one million dollars of revenue in 2015. Larger businesses will always generate more emissions than smaller ones; in order to do a fair comparison, we evaluated emissions intensity. We found it was 48.55 tonnes of CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) per million dollars. That’s about 55 per cent greater than the automotive sector at 31.4 tonnes of CO2e/$M for that same year. We restricted our analysis to the direct emissions generated by the companies’ operations and to the indirect emissions generated by the electricity purchased by these companies from their respective utilities companies. The total global emissions of the pharma sector amounts to about 52 megatonnes of CO2e in 2015, more than the 46.4 megatonnes of CO2e generated by the automotive sector in the same year. The value of the pharma market, however, is smaller than the automotive market. By our calculations, the pharma market is 28 per cent smaller yet 13 per cent more polluting than the automotive sector. Extreme variability We also found emissions intensity varied greatly within the pharmaceutical sector. For example, the emissions intensity of Eli Lilly (77.3 tonnes of CO2e/$M) was 5.5 times greater than Roche (14 tonnes CO2e/$M) in 2015, and Procter & Gamble’s CO2 emissions were five times greater than Johnson & Johnson even though the two companies generated the same level of revenues and sell similar lines of products. We found outliers too. The German company Bayer AG reported emissions of 9.7 megatonnes of CO2e and revenues of US$51.4 billion, yielding an emission intensity of 189 tonnes CO2e/$M. This intensity level is more than four times greater than the overall pharmaceutical sector. In trying to explain this incredibly large deviation, we found that Bayer’s revenues derive from pharmaceutical products, medical equipment and agricultural commodities. While Bayer reports its financial revenues separately for each division, it lumps together the emissions from all the divisions. The company also reports and tracks its emission intensity in terms of tonnes of CO2e produced for each tonne of manufactured goods, whether fertilizer or Aspirin, for example. This level of opacity makes it not only impossible to assess the true environmental performance of these kind of companies. It also raises questions about the sincerity of these companies’ strategies and actions in reducing their contribution to climate change. Climate compliance We also estimated how much the pharmaceutical sector would have to reduce its emissions to comply with the reduction targets in the Paris Agreement. We found that by 2025, the overall pharma sector would need to reduce its emissions intensity by about 59 per cent from 2015 levels. While this is clearly a far cry from their current levels, it is interesting to note that some of the 15 largest companies are already operating at that level, namely Amgen Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Roche Holding AG. If those performance levels are achievable by some, why can’t they be achieved by all? These three leading companies are also the ones with the highest level of profitability and revenue growth in the whole sector. Indeed Roche, Johnson & Johnson and Amgen showed revenue increases of 27.2 per cent, 25.7 per cent and 7.8 per cent respectively between 2012 and 2015, while managing to reduce their emissions by 18.7 per cent, 8.3 per cent and eight per cent respectively. This supports the premise that environmental and financial performance aren’t mutually exclusive. The pharmaceutical industry is responsible for some serious environmental impacts beyond greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the waste water from drug manufacturers in Patancheru, India has left river sediment, ground water and drinking water polluted. Researchers estimated that in a single day, 44 kilograms of ciprofloxacin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, was released — enough to treat everyone in a city of 44,000 inhabitants. Clearly, there is a dire need for more extensive and sustained research as well as more scrutiny of the pharmaceutical industry’s environmental practices and performance. Healing people is no justification for killing the planet. This article was first published here Published: May 27, 2019 Please leave your thoughts and comments below this article. 👇👇👇

This paper is a smoking gun. We first published this on 8th July 2021 I am re-publishing this again in late May 2023, and copy-pasting more of the key information from the study to make the points on Graphen Toxicity clearer, It's not a short read. As you read, check the toxicity and compare to the symptoms to the Pandemic. QUOTE: "...Graphene and its derivatives are heralded as “miracle” materials with manifold applications in different sectors of society from electronics to energy storage to medicine. The increasing exploitation of graphene-based materials (GBMs) necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the potential impact of these materials on human health and the environment. Here, we discuss synthesis and characterization of GBMs as well as human and environmental hazard assessment of GBMs using in vitro and in vivo model systems with the aim to understand the properties that underlie the biological effects of these materials; not all GBMs are alike, and it is essential that we disentangle the structure–activity relationships for this class of materials..." https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.8b04758# Graphene Oxide flakes 2023 COPY-PASTE ADDITIONS LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

A new paper was released via the WCH a few days ago. The press release and links are below. Interestingly, the paper points out the similarities between Long Covid and Vaccine Injury. Within the paper's conclusion/discussion, they admit the study is based around the concept of 'the spike protein' being the issue. This leaves the possibility of toxins like graphene oxide and EMFs being responsible for the conditions we have witnessed out in the open. Spike proteins Graphene's atomic structure enabling atom-thick 'sheets' or 'flakes' SPIKE PROTEIN OR GRAPHENE? IS THIS IMPORTANT? Understanding the cause of a symptom is crucial in the same way that someone tackling a fire needs to know the fire's cause. Not all fires are the same. Water can extinguish a wood fire yet can be catastrophic if used to try and quell a chip pan fire. Hence fires have multiple 'cures' depending on their source, as shown in the diagram below. NEW PAPER: Strategies for the Management of Spike Protein-Related Pathology Abstract "...In the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, a need has arisen to prevent and treat two related conditions, COVID-19 vaccine injury and long COVID-19, both of which can trace at least part of their aetiology to the spike protein, which can cause harm through several mechanisms. One significant mechanism of harm is vascular, and it is mediated by the spike protein, a common element of the COVID-19 illness, and it is related to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Given the significant number of people experiencing these two related conditions, it is imperative to develop treatment protocols, as well as to consider the diversity of people experiencing long COVID-19 and vaccine injury. This review summarizes the known treatment options for long COVID-19 and vaccine injury, their mechanisms, and their evidentiary basis..." This is the paper's discussion/conclusion "...The amelioration of symptoms and recovery of large numbers of people worldwide from both long COVID and post-vaccine syndrome and injury requires the use of non-invasive, integrative therapies that can be scaled and administered in a decentralized fashion. It is important to disseminate this knowledge to the lay public so that they can mitigate their individual risks and those of their loved ones. While it is difficult to enumerate the true scale of post-vaccination or post-COVID clotting disorders, there has been an appreciable rise in cardiac incidents [29], strokes (inter-cerebral hemorrhages [338]), and non-COVID excess mortality [339,340]. A significant increase in total mortality due to a vaccine is not unprecedented, as the DTP vaccine administered in Guineau-Bissau in the 1980s increased child mortality by four times compared to unvaccinated mortality [341]. While the magnitude of the impact of both long COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 Vaccine Syndrome or injury is unclear, it is important to prepare for the potential consequences by having information ready for dissemination, as well as to perform research on promising therapeutics to relieve the damage caused by spike protein and other potential mechanisms of harm, such as DNA integration [342]. One limitation of this study is that it focuses on spike-protein related pathology and can leave out other possibilities, such as allergies to vaccine components, or other disease etiologies. (NOTE: Or the possibility of graphene oxide poisoning) Long COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome are multifaceted disorders, with highly varied manifestations; as such, the development of objective diagnostics is important in treating patients. The therapies discussed in this review have a varying evidentiary basis and may serve as starting points for the development of therapies to relieve spike protein-related pathologies in the coming years. Further research requires validating the treatments outlined in this review by randomized control trial (RCT), observational studies, and laboratory studies of biological mechanism. Furthermore, integration of the current research on spike-protein related disorders is helpful. One possibility is the application of systems biology tools to describe the perturbations to different biological pathways influenced by the spike protein. When such a model exists, it is possible to treat the acute manifestations of the disease while still clearing spike protein from the body. Governments and national health services are beginning to come to terms with the sheer magnitude of the task in front of them. This review outlines some of the most promising therapies from an evidentiary and biological mechanistic perspective. We hope that this article be used in the construction of treatment protocols to treat these highly related conditions in their many disease manifestations, prioritizing not only safety and efficacy, but cost and availability to large numbers of people..." WCH PRESS RELEASE New Peer-Reviewed Study Outlines Promising Therapies for Treating Long Covid and C-19 Vaccine Injury An international team of physicians and scientists recently completed the first peer-reviewed research into the available options for treating long Covid and C-19 vaccine injury that will lay the groundwork for a better understanding and potential future treatments for the two conditions. The study was published this week in the MDPI journal, Microorganisms. “We are proud to partner with the World Council for Health on this important paper that I hope is the beginning of more research into these poorly understood conditions,” said Paul Marik, M.D., a co-author of the study and the chief scientific officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. “I’m thankful to my colleagues who treat patients suffering from long Covid or vaccine injury every day. In most cases, these patients have nowhere else to go. This research should educate others on the reality of these conditions and how they can be treated.” “People who are suffering from long Covid or have been harmed by the Covid vaccines are often ignored or have been abandoned by the medical establishment,” said Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, Ph.D.​, a co-author of the study & co-founder of the World Council for Health. “This research shows that there is clear scientific evidence that both long Covid and the Covid vaccines are responsible for spike protein-induced conditions that will require a significant investment of resources before we fully understand these conditions and how to treat them most effectively.” “I am proud of this great research facilitated by our WCH Health and Science Committee,” Lawrie added. "In addition to Dr Marik, I want to express my sincere gratitude to the paper’s lead author, Matthew Halma and co-author, Christof Plothe.” Press release: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/treating-long-covid/ LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

The news of Dr Buttar's death has sent a wave of shock around the world and naturally, people are asking questions. How can a middle-aged healthy doctor in the prime of his wisdom - a teacher of cutting-edge healing who has saved or improved the lives of many, if not millions - die so suddenly? I have thought about this over the last 24 hrs. With deep respect for the grieving family (see their announcement here) who will be devastated, bewildered and in shock, should be silent? Or, on the other hand as brothers in arms, is not our duty to ask the most important questions? Dr Buttar was one of the Disinformation Dozen, a group of twelve individuals identified as responsible for up to 65% of all anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms. The 'Disinformation Dozen' is a blacklist, or hitlist, made public. Those on this list have released critical alternative information skirting the near-strangle grip of the pharma-industrial complex, threatening not only billions in profits, but the humanicidal plans of a tiny minority of superrich madmen. Dr Buttar was not silent about his suspicions regarding the cause behind his recent health issues (see video below), so nor should we. As Dr Buttar said himself: Most intelligent people know that everything is not as it appears! Now, more than ever before, knowing the truth determines if you live or die. Dr Buttar Dr Rashid A Buttar 1966 - 2023 Dr Buttar explains his poisoning after CNN interview in 17th May 2023 interview. Here is the clip of @DrButtar on @LauraLynnTT just a few days ago. He said he had been poisoned by a ratio of 200x of what was in the jab only a few months ago. See Dr Buttar describe his poisoning here. https://rumble.com/embed/v2jzhwa/?pub=4 DR BUTTAR ATTACKED ON CNN Dr Buttar's words will go down in history in this hit piece 20th October 2021 This CNN'hit job will forever remain as evidence of the lies and corruption in this attempt to lose his licence. Dr Buttar - a true hero. WHO ARE THE DISINFORMATION DOZEN? Disinformation Dozen" refers to a group of twelve individuals identified by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a UK/US non-profit organization, in a report published in March 2021. The CCDH claimed these twelve individuals were responsible for up to 65% of all anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms, focusing mainly on the COVID-19 vaccine. U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy stated: "Misinformation takes away our freedom to make informed decisions about our health and the health of our loved ones during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health misinformation has led people to resist wearing masks in high-risk settings. It's led them to turn down proven treatments and to choose not to get vaccinated." Imran Ahmed, CEO of CCDH, said: "The 'Disinformation Dozen' are serial offenders. Their posts contain false claims that violate the policies of social media platforms, yet they remain. It is clear that self-regulation is not working." U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar commented: "We need a long-term, whole-of-society strategy to counter the flood of dangerous and misleading information that is pouring into and out of our social media ecosystem." The "Disinformation Dozen" are... (These descriptions were taken via AI searches hence the angle) This list is US-centric missing many key medical activists. The factor here seems to the nominess success at getting information over to the public. It is notable that Del Big Tree, The Highwire TV programme. Polly Tommy and Dr Angdrew Wakefield (now living in the US) who are behind the wonderful film VAXXED are not on is list. Something we all should strive for! :) 1- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: An attorney, author, and prominent anti-vaccine activist. He's the founder of Children's Health Defense, an organization that has been accused of spreading vaccine misinformation. NOTB RATING RFK is Superb. A lawyer converted from environmental mercury poisoning to the associated mercury and aluminium poisoning via childhood vaccine by a worried parent. Behind the times on the Climate change scam but a new leader of the vaccine-damage awareness movement only equal to Del Bigtree of the Highwire A future US president in the running. Runs the superb Children's Health Defence. A trusted source of childhood vaccine information Is this Kennedy now on a new assassination list? 2 - Joseph Mercola: A physician and alternative medicine proponent. He runs a popular website where he shares health-related content, including controversial views on vaccination. NOTB RATING Mercola is maybe the best all-around source for general medical information. A multi-millionaire via his supplement products. Partner of Erin AKA Health Nut News. Mercola is a trusted source of health information 3 - The Bollingers: Ty and his wife, Charlene, run The Truth About Cancer and The Truth About Vaccines, both platforms used to share alternative views on these topics. NOTB RATING. The Bollingers are a normal couple thrust into the limelight via their go-to source of collated information on the big 'C' via their Truth On Cancer video series. Know anyone that has cancer and needs all the cutting-edge information as quickly as possible? Send them here. 4 - Sherri Tenpenny: An osteopathic physician. A prolific author and speaker known for her controversial stance on vaccines. NOTB RATING: A fearless outspoken Doctor-warrior. There are very few of these. 5 - Rizza Islam: An author and activist, he often shares controversial views on vaccines, especially in relation to the African American community. NOTB RATING: Off my radar previously. See his twitter post regarding Dr Buttar's death below 6 - Rashid Buttar: An osteopathic physician known for spreading controversial theories about vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic. NOTB RATING: See our previous post announcing his death 7 - Erin Elizabeth: A health blogger and partner to Joseph Mercola, she shares similar views about vaccines on her platform. NOTB RATING: Partner of Mercola famous for highlighting the spree of suspicious doctor deaths in the USA. Had made factual mistakes in the past, but well worth keeping on the radar. 8 - Sayer Ji: Founder of the website GreenMedInfo, where he shares alternative views on health, including controversial opinions on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Got to source for all the medical papers regarding supplemements, herbs and non-pharma remedies. Outstanding work. Sayer Ji is greatly under-recognised, probably due to the lack of monetisation of his work and entailing restriction of marketing resources. 9 - Kelly Brogan: A psychiatrist, she promotes alternative health views and has shared controversial opinions on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment 10 - Christiane Northrup: An OB/GYN, she uses her platform to share alternative health views, including controversial opinions about vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment 11 - Ben Tapper: A chiropractor who has used his platform to share controversial views on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment 12 - Kevin Jenkins: The CEO of the Urban Global Health Alliance, he uses his platform to share controversial views on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment SOURCES: The CCDH's report: "The Disinformation Dozen" https://252f2edd-1c8b-49f5-9bb2-cb57bb47e4ba.filesusr.com/ugd/f4d9b9_b7cedc0553604a948726 Rizz Islam on the Dr Butta's deaths and the “Disinformation Dozen” "...BREAKING - One of the Whitehouse listed members of the “Disinformation Dozen” Dr. Rashid Buttar has passed at the age of 57. As one of the 12 myself, I am truly saddened by this news. Brother Buttar was uncompromising and this was my most appreciated trait of his. As we were exposing the lies of Covid-19 that were foisted upon the masses the Black community only had a few voices representing us on this level. @LouisFarrakhan @DrButtar and a few more. His work is powerful and helped many! Never be reasonable with this system! I pray his family receives proper comfort. P.S. I am thankful he expressed this as a poisoning. The people must understand how real this is and brother Buttar more than a medical professional as a VETERAN KNEW just how serious this enemy is. His energy will live on and we all should continue his work of standing for the people. May Allah be pleased..." @unhealthytruth #IntellectualXtremist#DrButtar#DisInformationDozen Erin Healthnut updates her list to include Dr Buttar Dr Buttar's recent live Video on Twitter Advanced Medicine: https://www.advancedmedicine.com/site/ Advanced medicine conference.: https://advancedmedicineconference.com/ SOURCE: https://drbuttar.info/ Please feel free to add your messages in the comments

On Saturday there was a protest for the C19 vaccine injured at Trafalgar Square. The protest was headlined by Dr Mike Yeadon, MP Andrew Brigden, UB40's Matt Hoy and Patrick Henningsen from the UK column. It was poorly attended with just 300-500 people. Was this due to protest fatigue? Are people resigned, feeling it's too late for the injured? Poor marketing? (Probably caused by point 4) Division within the UK freedom movement meaning a majority of the injured and a good majority of the freedom movement leaders would attend or back this particular protest? Dr Mike Yeadon started his first protest speech on Saturday at the Trafalgar Square rally for those injured by the c19 vaccine with softly spoken words, before his frustrations lead him to rise in tone delivering the best speech of the day. Although, as Mike admits, he is newly awakened, it was impressive to hear him mention that he no longer believes C19 was a respiratory disease with classic modes of 'infection'. "...I started in 2020 believing that viruses transmitted disease from one person to another - I no longer believe that.." He doesn't mention what he now believes. He does not mention the use of electromagnetic frequencies. But this is a huge step. But for now, three cheers for Dr Yeadon as he tracks his path from his awakening from a 'normie' in 2020 to his realisations today - a must-watch. Scroll down under the video for some more of the images I took... Please leave your comments under this article. See on youtube here: https://youtu.be/U8c7tRZh96Y Images of a tiny proportion of the vaccine injured. Poor turn out Tess Lawrie See the last vaccine injury date here

With great sadness, we have news of the loss of one of the world's top freedom-fighting Doctors. "...The Buttar Family is deeply saddened to announce the passing of Rashid A. Buttar, D.O. Dr. Buttar passed away on May 18th, 2023, at his home, while spending time with his family. Dr. Buttar attended Washington University and graduated with a double major in Biology and Theology. He then went on to earn a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine degree from the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences in Des Moines, Iowa. Dr. Buttar was a retired Major in the US Army. He served with the 5th Special Forces group and the 101st Airborne Division. He is survived by his three loving children, Sara, (30) Abie, (24) and Rahan (18). Service arrangements have not yet been made. The family intends to have a private service. The family requests privacy at this time and appreciates your continued support and prayers..." Dr Rashid A Buttar 1966 - 2023 "...Most intelligent people know that everything is not as it appears! Truth will never be suppressed and as the light begins to illuminate the truth, the world will see the facts as they truly are, regardless of the deceptions being espoused by the world’s governments and the mainstream media. Now, more than ever before, knowing the truth determines if you live or die! As a result, this particular time in human history becomes an incredibly important and exciting time to be alive...." Dr Buttar Cause of death? We have no news of the reason behind Dr Buttar's passing, but anyone awake to the work of such freedom fighters will know full well the associated perils of making a stand against the tyranny and corruption of big pharma. Here is a list of over 100. more ground-breaking doctors who suffered suspicious deaths. https://healthnutnews.com/Recap/ UPDATE - Was Dr Buttar Murdered? For our latest post on this death and murder suspicions. please see here TRIBUTE May peace be with you Dr Buttar. Thank you for all your work. The fight for the truth, medical freedom and the continuation of the natural beauty of humankind free from transhumanism will continue, all the more stronger for all that you did. Please leave your comments, thoughts and condolences under this article. No sign-up needed. Not On The Beeb is archived by the National British Library, so your comments and tributes to the great man will be etched into time. Dr Buttar's 17th May live Video on Twitter Cuttings from Dr Buttar's website: https://drbuttar.info/ Who Is Dr Buttar? “Dr. Rashid A. Buttar became an Eagle Scout at the age of 14, becoming the youngest person in the US to get his Eagle in 1980. He then graduated from high school at age 17 and received his undergraduate degree from Washington University in St. Louis. While at Washington University, Dr. Buttar was on a full academic ROTC scholarship and played football as linebacker and defensive end for the WashU Bears. After graduating with a double major in Biology and Theology at age 21, Dr. Buttar attended medical school at the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery in Des Moines, Iowa, graduating with his medical degree at the age of 25. Dr. Buttar did a rotational internship with an emphasis in General Surgery in Houston, Texas and then later trained in General Surgery at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas. While serving in the US Army, Dr. Buttar also served as Brigade Surgeon for 2nd Infantry Division stationed in the Republic of South Korea, and later as Chief of the Department of Emergency Medicine at Moncrief Army Community Hospital at Ft. Jackson in Columbia, South Carolina while serving in the US Army. Dr Buttar's Training! Dr. Buttar made the list for promotion to Major in the US Army at the age of 28, becoming the youngest person to make the list for the rank of Major that year in the US Army just prior to finishing his service in the Armed Forces. During his military career, Dr. Buttar had the privilege of serving with and/or being attached to the 2nd Infantry Division, the 101stAir Assault Division and the 5th Special Forces Group. Dr. Buttar is board certified and a Diplomate in Clinical Metal Toxicology and Preventive Medicine, is board eligible in Emergency Medicine and has achieved fellowship status in three separate medical organizations (Fellow of the American College for Advancement in Medicine, Fellow of the American Academy of Preventive Medicine, and Fellow of the American Association of Integrative Medicine). Dr. Buttar now serves as the Medical Director for the Centers for Advanced Medicine. The Centers are located in NC and CA, specializing in the treatment and needs of patients refractory to conventional treatments who have failed the standard approach to their disease process. With a special emphasis on the inter-relationship between environmental toxicity and the insidious disease processes and the “dis-regulation” of the immune system, Dr. Buttar and the Centers have attracted patients from over 90 different countries suffering from autism, cancer, heart disease, stroke and many other conditions too numerous to list. Dr Buttar's Accomplishments Dr. Buttar also served in the past as Visiting Scientist as well as Nutritional Scientist at North Carolina State University and actively taught for well over 20 years as faculty for mainstream medical courses such as Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses for physicians through the American College of Surgeons as well as the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) courses for physicians, nurses and emergency response personnel. In addition, Dr. Buttar served as faculty for the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) courses for over 15 years. Dr. Buttar’s first book, “The 9 Steps to Keep the Doctor Away” released in 2010 became a Wall Street Journal, USA Today and Amazon.com best seller and has since, become an international best seller, now translated into multiple languages. In 2019, Dr. Buttar initiated the Advanced Medicine Conference to allow physicians, researchers and scientists on the cutting edge of medicine to have a platform from which they could introduce their findings to the world. In 2023, the 5th Annual Advanced Medicine Conference will be held. Advanced Medicine: https://www.advancedmedicine.com/site/ Advanced medicine conference.: https://advancedmedicineconference.com/ SOURCE: https://drbuttar.info/ Please leave your comments, thoughts and condolences under this article. No sign-up needed. Not On The Beeb is archived by the National British Library, so your comments and tributes to the great man will be etched into time. TWITTER - NOTB https://twitter.com/NotOnTheBeeb/status/1659861451270414339? TELEGRAM - NOTB https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/9304 MESSAGES OF CONDOLENCE Thank you for letting us know of Dr Buttar! This is truly tragic and sinister! His good thoughts and works will live on and I send condolences to his family. RIP lovely soul. 💜💜 Theresa I am so shocked, upset and saddened to learn of the terrible news of the passing of one of the earliest and most courageous fighters against the Covid lies Dr Rashid Buttar. Dr Buttar was an inspiration to all who heard his message across the world. My deepest condolences go out to all of his family, friends and all who knew him. The world has lost a most needed hero at this time in history who will be most sorely missed. Rest in peace dear Dr Rashid Buttar, may the lord God bless you always. Nora Really shocked and sad to hear that Dr Buttar has passed away. I stopped watching him quite a while ago but he was one of the doctors that I liked listening to during the last three years. I feel everyone who spoke up showed no fear or at least had great courage and have been like a beacon of light for those of us who somehow escaped the spell that has hypnotised much of the world’s population. Catherine So sad. Why do the good for young. TOP Dr Butter and sincere condolences to his family. I hope the cause of death will be investigated. Wilma My greatest respect and thoughts go to Dr Buttar's family and survivors. Dr Buttar has taught me so much, and I respected him immensely – honour his memory Cliff Yep, very suspicious as the good man didn't have any major health problems. In fact, he was very healthy!!! You guys are spot on... someone killed him!!! Wilma Thank you for sharing this deeply saddening news 💙 I have been following Rashid's work for many years, such a brave soul whom has stood up time and time again to warn about the medical mafia in the face of adversity. Risking it all. I guess they finished him off to shut him up for good! This sad news will kick up a storm by the truthers around the world! I hope! Leah God bless dr butter only god knows why he had to return so early he will never be forgotten in our hearts he built a temple Anon I am shocked and my heart hurts as I am sure his family must be...he was the 1st person who gave me hope when this plandemic started by speaking the truth. The truth was unpalatable of course but I am aware its was possibly more unpalatable to those who created this global mess. Anon To, Sara,Abie and Rahan, I am deeply saddened by the news of your father's sudden demise. May his soul rest in peace. May the Divine Providence give you and all other family members the strength and courage to bear this loss. Your father was a gem of a person. He started spreading the truth when hardly anyone dared to. This is a loss for the entire human race. Please accept my heartfelt condolences. Anon This doctor was responsible for making me see the world through a different lens. He was a wonderful human being and family man. My abiding memory of Dr Buttar is him saying that he’d ”rather take a bullet than the ‘C vaccine’. That is exactly the way I feel. This legend, I have no doubt, was the victim of foul play. Anon How tragic and heartbreaking to learn of this. No doubt evil play at work. L What sad news , my Heart and Thoughts go to Dr. Rashid A Buttar 's family . May he rest in Peace knowing he did his best for humankind , against such bitter odds . May his family take strength in knowing he was an Honourable Brave Man .Bless 🙏 Anon Sending much love to Dr Buttars family. He was a huge source of knowledge , truth & comfort over the last few years. He was a great man & will be truly missed x Anon Please feel free to add your message of condolence in the comments below.

Vax Injury Test Case Class Action Covid UK is now inviting those who have been harmed by any of the Covid vaccines to contact us at: hello@cacuk.uk Please let people know about this. We can only consider cases in England or Wales currently. Claimants should email us with the following details: 1. Date of vaccination/s (include a copy of your vaccination record, if you have it) 2. Details of your injury and when the symptoms started 3. What medical attention you’ve received and whether the cause is confirmed 4. How your injury has impacted your life/ lifestyle 5. Your name, age and a telephone number for us to contact you. A test case is a single case where the outcome would have significance not only for the person bringing it, but for many others too. It tests an area of law to get clarity and establish legal rights or principles. Please note that we will try to contact everyone, but we will of seeking to identify one case that will be most likely to win and set a precedent for everyone else, so please know that while we’re sympathetic to everyone who is suffering, we will need to be selective when deciding which case to proceed with. See more: https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/ Telegram: t.me/CACUKsupport Website: https://cacuk.uk/ Subscribe: https://cacuk.uk/join-us

Dear Prime Minister, I am the Chairman of the Board of the UK Council for Psychotherapy (UKCP), one of the UK's foremost psychological governing bodies. However, I write this open letter in my own capacity. I believe I have a professional obligation to write to you in an attempt to protect the public from any further harm caused by the unethical application of psychological research and practice. I unreservedly condemn the UK Government's use of unethical psychological techniques intended to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt, under the guise of behavioural science / insights which were designed to change the public's behaviour without their knowledge and conscious participation. It is now clear that in 2020 the UK Government deliberately chose to artificially inflate the level of fear within the UK population by exaggerating the risk factors of Covid19, and concomitantly downplaying the protective factors. We also witnessed the Government's promotion of social disapproval and guilt messaging. These techniques were embedded into a multi-channel, co-ordinated public health campaign designed to change the public's behaviour without their knowledge. Moreover, in tandem with the mainstream media, the Government also proactively suppressed, censored, and ostracised any healthcare professional or scientist who suggested alternative responses to Covid19, or who simply questioned the messaging and measures being implemented by the Government. Evidence of the recommendation of using unethical psychological techniques to gain behavioural change The Government document titled 'Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures' (Gov.uk, 2020) was written for the Government by the Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) which is a subgroup of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). The premise of the document was to provide options for changing the behaviour of the UK public without their knowledge. A passage within this document states: "A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened". It makes certain recommendations including: "The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard hitting emotional messaging". "Coercion" "Social disapproval". (Gov.uk, 2020) The recommendations made by SPI-B included ones intended to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt. Psychological practitioners know that deliberately trying to frighten someone into change with erroneous or exaggerated information can easily cause long-term psychological damage. We also know that using social disapproval can create splits and divisions within society, and that inducing feelings of guilt can elevate the risk of suicide. SPI-B also included a simple risk assessment matrix which acknowledges that the 'spill over effects' of using media to increase the sense of personal threat and of using social disapproval 'could be negative'. There is also a statement demonstrating there was a conversation regarding the spill over effects, although this does not appear to be fully documented. The risk factors and ethics of using fear, shame, guilt, and coercion would almost certainly have been known to the members of SPI-B because several members were British Psychological Society (BPS) registered chartered psychologists. In an interview with one of the members of SPI-B, BPS registered educational psychologist Dr Gavin Morgan, he refers to the use of fear by his SPI-B colleagues and says: 'Clearly using fear as a means of control is not ethical. What you do as a psychologist is co-construction. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It's not an ethical stance for any modern government… Was it unethical to use fear, I asked? Well I didn't suggest we use fear' But your colleagues did. What do you think of that? He paused. 'Oh God'. 'Another reluctant pause. It's not ethical,' he said (Dodsworth, 2021, pp. 262,263). Like Dr Morgan, any BPS registered psychologists within SPI-B would or should have recognised that recommending the Government uses fear as a means of controlling the public breached their professional code of ethics and conduct. An urgent investigation is required both by the UK Government and the BPS. Two specific points of The British Psychological Society Code of Ethics and Conduct (2021) that may have been broken are (with my underlining): 3.3 Responsibility. Because of their acknowledged expertise, members of the Society often enjoy professional autonomy; responsibility is an essential element of autonomy. Members must accept appropriate responsibility for what is within their power, control or management. Awareness of responsibility ensures that the trust of others is not abused, the power of influence is properly managed and that duty towards others is always paramount. Statement of values: Members value their responsibilities to persons and peoples, to the general public, and to the profession and science of psychology, including the avoidance of harm and the prevention of misuse or abuse of their contribution to society. In applying these values, psychologists should consider: Professional accountability; Responsible use of their knowledge and skills; Respect for the welfare of humans, non-humans and the living world; Potentially competing duties. 3.4 Integrity. Acting with integrity includes being honest, truthful, accurate and consistent in one's actions, words, decisions, methods and outcomes. It requires setting self-interest to one side and being objective and open to challenge in one's behaviour in a professional context. Statement of values: Members value honesty, probity, accuracy, clarity and fairness in their interactions with all persons and peoples, and seek to promote integrity in all facets of their scientific and professional endeavours". Share Evidence that psychological techniques to induce fear, shame, guilt and coercion were used on the UK public The SPI-B document in question (Gov.uk, 2020) demonstrates that the options of eliciting feelings of fear, shame, guilt and the use of coercion was recommended to the UK Government. There is evidence that those options were indeed subsequently deployed on the UK population. In August 2022, you stated: "In every brief, we tried to say: let's stop the fear narrative'. It was always wrong from the beginning. I constantly said it was wrong... It was wrong to scare people like that". (Sunak, R as quoted in The Spectator, 2022). Additionally, leaked WhatsApp messages from the former Health Minister at the time, Matt Hancock, published in The Daily Telegraph in March 2023, confirm that fear and guilt were used: "Hancock: We frighten the pants of everyone with the new strain. But the complications with that Brexit is taking the top line Poole: Yep that's what will get proper bahviour (sic) change Hancock:When do we deploy the new variant" And, "Case: Ramping up messaging - the fear /guilt factor vital" (The Daily Telegraph, 2023a) The above are just two examples where senior Government Ministers recognised that fear and guilt was used as drivers for behavioural change of the UK population without their knowledge. The existing literature It is important to acknowledge that the above-mentioned psychological techniques were used on the UK population without their knowledge or consent, and that this in direct contradiction of long-established and carefully considered behavioural science advice which made clear that, in theory and practice, the consent of the public is paramount. "The use of MINDSPACE (or other 'nudge' type policy tools) may require careful handling - in essence, the public need to give permission and help shape how such tools are used". (Institute of Government, 2010, p. 10) Continuing, the report states: "Policy-makers wishing to use these tools summarised in MINDSPACE need the approval of the public to do so". (Institute of Government, 2010, p. 74) Further literature supports that permission from the public is essential: "If there is one great risk to the application of behavioural insights in policy, it is that the thread of public permission wears too thin. If governments, or indeed communities or companies, wish to use behavioural insights, they must seek and maintain the permission of the public to do so" (Halpern, 2015, p. 365). As there was no approval obtained, the options recommended and deployed were not in alignment with the principles of behavioural science. It is important to highlight that the same kinds of techniques were used on children in relation to mask wearing, social distancing and vaccine uptake, with many techniques continuing into 2022. These techniques violated UNICEF's (2021) recommendations from their ethical tool- kit for behavioural science projects directed at children. The tool-kit states: "A core idea underlying the applied behavioural science approach is that interventions should not restrict choice and should transparently communicate project goals. When designing an intervention, practitioners should determine how transparent it will be to those affected by it. They should ensure that children and parents can easily opt out, and should design feedback mechanisms so that children and their parents can voice concerns, see the outcomes of their objections, and hold decision-makers to account". (UNICEF, 2021) The behavioural science literature also indicates a potential link between the misuse of behavioural psychology and an increased risk of suicide, stemming from an All Party Parliamentary Group Report on the Morse Review into the Loan Charge in 2020. One of the recommendations within the report demands: "An independent assessment and a suspension of HMRC's use of behavioural psychology/behavioural insights, in light of the ongoing suicide risk to those impacted by the Loan Charge". (Loan Charge All-Party Parliamentary Group, 2020) The literature highlights that approval from the public must be sought and maintained. Additionally, all behavioural science projects directed at children must have effective feedback mechanisms and methods of opting out, with decision makers able to be held accountable. There are also existing potential concerns that behavioural science may increase suicide levels. These important ethical aspects and safety signals appear to have been ignored. The lessons of history warn us that in times of existential crisis, whether real or only perceived, our ethics are at risk of being abandoned, and psychological knowledge can become misused by governments: "Under some historical conditions or circumstances and contexts, psychologists and psychological knowledge were in danger of being abused by political powers, largely for clandestine purposes, such as conducting torture or the persecution of political opponents." (Maercker A, Guski-Leinwand S, 2018) It is of grave concern that the actions of the UK Government during the covid era potentially fit into the category of abusing psychological knowledge and being absent of ethics, thus require serious investigation. The impact of psychological pressure on informed consent For the sake of brevity, I will not reiterate the multiple concerns already documented by others surrounding the consequences of the Government's actions around lockdown, hospital discharges, school closures and mask mandates (Amnesty International, 2020), (Byrne S et al, 2023) (Daily Telegraph, 2023b), (Mail Online, 2022), (Office for National Statistics, 2021), (The Guardian, 2021). I do, however, wish to highlight one extremely serious consequence that I believe has occurred as a direct result of the use of unethical psychological techniques/ behavioural insights on the unknowing public: by adopting the techniques used, the Government significantly and materially undermined, if not removed, the UK population's ability to give valid informed consent to taking a Covid19 vaccine. According to Public Health England: "Consent must be obtained before starting any treatment or physical investigation or before providing personal care for a patient. This includes the administration of all vaccines". Also, "It is a legal and ethical principle that valid consent must be obtained before starting personal care, treatment or investigations". Also, "For consent to immunisation to the (sic) valid, it must be given freely, voluntarily and without coercion by an appropriately informed person who has the mental capacity to consent to the administration of the vaccines in question". (Gov.uk, 2021) From the above, it is clear that for medical consent to be valid it must be given without coercion. The Encyclopedia Britannica defines coercion as: "The threat or use of punitive measures against states, groups or individuals in order for them to undertake or desist from specified actions. In addition to the threat of or limited use of force (or both), coercion may entail economic sanctions, psychological pressures, and social ostracism. (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2023). The psychological techniques used by the UK Government fall under that definition of coercion. If follows that according to Public Health England's statements and for the general public at least, consent to immunisation was, invalidated by the behaviour of the UK Government. It is also important to highlight that there have been serious injuries and death directly linked to the Covid19 vaccine. Many of those injured or who have died would not have taken a vaccine if they had not been psychologically pressured, feared being ostracised socially and/or were given accurate information. The removal of the general population's ability to give informed medical consent is of the gravest concern, and a severe and dangerous consequence of using behavioural insights / psychological techniques on an unknowing public. Conclusion The need to hold tightly to professional ethics, in particular to the ethical principle of informed consent, is not just an 'academic' issue. It is a matter of practical and fundamental importance to responsible government. According to Halpern (2015, p. 348) "Behavioural insights, like any other form of knowledge, can be used for good or bad". It is my opinion that the use of behavioural insights and psychological techniques designed to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt utilised by the UK Government since March 2020 has been unethical. The consequences are still unravelling but they appear to include serious damage to trust in government and its agencies, the NHS, and the medical and scientific professions. I propose that there be an immediate cessation of the use of all behavioural science techniques designed to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt used by the Government pending an urgent, open and independent inquiry. This inquiry should also have as an objective the re-establishment of ethical frameworks necessary to protect the public and to provide accountability. I would welcome a discussion on this most important of matters. Most respectfully Dr Christian Buckland Doctor of Psychology in Psychotherapy and Counselling Amnesty International. (2020, October 4). UK: Older people in care homes abandoned to die amid government failures during COVID-19 pandemic. The British Psychology Society (2021, December) Code of Ethics and Conduct. Byrne S., Sledge, H., Franklin, R., Boland F., Murray D., Hourihane, J. (2023). Social communication skill attainment in babies born during the COVID-19 pandemic: a birth cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child.,108: 20-24 The Daily Telegraph. (2023, March 10a). The Lockdown Files. The Daily Telegraph. (2023, March 23b). I lost my daughter to suicide in lockdown - she was failed by the system. Dodsworth, L. (2021). A State of Fear. How the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic. London: Pinter and Martin. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2022, September 28). Coercion. Gov.uk. (2020, May 5). Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures, 22 March 2020. Gov.uk. (2021, June). PHE Greenbook of immunisation chapter 2 Consent. The Guardian. (2021, Feb 13). Fury at 'do not resuscitate' notices given to Covid patients with learning disabilities. Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit. London. WH Allen and Co. Institute for Government. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour for public policy. Loan Charge All-Party Parliamentary Group. (2020, March). Loan-Charge-APPG-Report-into-the-Morse-Review- FINAL.pdf. Maercker A, Guski-Leinwand S. (2018). Psychologists' Involvement in Repressive "Stasi" Secret Police. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 107-119. Mail Online (2022, October 21). Lockdowns - collateral cancer burden 40 thousand tumours missed year pandemic. Office for National Statistics. (2021, May 7). Deaths at home increased by a third in 2020, while deaths in hospitals fell except for COVID-19. The Spectator. (2022, August 27). The lockdown files: Rishi Sunak on what we weren't told. UNICEF. (2021, October 03). Ethical considerations when applying behavioural science in projects focused on children. SOURCE: https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-the-uk-prime-minister?r=dvb3y&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Stand-up comic Phil Zimmerman was a stand-alone comic during the pandemic. He was unique amongst his profession, daring to make his voice heard while others were either blinded by the propaganda, or were aware, but hiding in silence fearful for their own security. A person who says (like most of us) "I told you so", is annoying to those reminded of their mistake. Yet a person who can say "I was wrong," and can mock themselves, is a true human at their best. Meet James McCann of Australia as he nails it with this short 60-second clip... See on youtube here: https://youtu.be/-G4VJrCpyb8 See on Telegram here: https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/9207 See On Twitter: https://twitter.com/NotOnTheBeeb/status/1658114240132120580?s=20 Please leave your comments under this article. Add any links to other comedians needing coverage.

In this 30-minute presentation and Q&A with world glutathione expert Dr Jimmy Gutman, he explains the complex relationship between cancer and glutathione. He explains the studies which show glutathione precursor supplementation can improve the effectiveness (if this route was chosen) of chemo and radiation. Dr Gutman's paper "Therapeutic Potential of Glutathione Augmentation in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy"can be found here What is Cachexia? Cachexia is severe weight loss due to cancer. Tackling it has been an age-long quest and one that has bothered me for personal reasons deeply "...Cancer cachexia is a specific form of cachexia that occurs in patients with various types of malignancies, affecting approximately 50-80% of cancer patients. It is particularly prevalent in patients with advanced stages of cancer and is responsible for a significant proportion of cancer-related deaths. This debilitating syndrome is marked by severe involuntary weight loss due to muscle wasting and the loss of adipose tissue, resulting in physical impairment and reduced tolerance to cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The exact mechanisms leading to cancer cachexia are still not completely understood, but it is believed to involve a combination of tumour-derived factors, host immune response, and systemic inflammation, which collectively contribute to the accelerated breakdown of muscle and fat tissues...." Basically, advanced cancer deprives the body of needed nutrients whereby the patient suffers dramatic weight loss akin to starvation. As you can see in the video above, patients with severe cachexia were divided into two groups. One group were the standard placebo and the other had a few pouches of Immunocal daily. The results are astounding. The next year only 50% of the control group were alive, whereas 80% of the group with supplementation had survived. I personally wish I'd known this years ago. You now have this information. Please share it with those at need. If you'd like some more info in the meantime join our Glutathione group.

This is Not On The Beeb's 75th Adverse event report. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 22nd FEBRUARY 2023 (Data published 8th Mar 2023) New interactive format Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses - people having one or more booster - 40,622,659 (up to 20th Feb) All boosters = 67.26 million doses • Pfizer - 33.1m(monovalent) & 11.5m (bivalent) • Astrazeneca - 60,900 • Moderna - 13.3m (monovalent) & 9.3m (bivalent) • Novavax - 1,200 Additional all-brand doses given in last 4 weeks - 3230 (Pfizer-mono) + 127,312 (Pfizer-bivalent) + zero (AZ) + 176 (Moderna-mono) + 4335 (Moderna-bivalent) + 200 (Novavax) = 135,253 TOTAL DOSES administered (approx.) = 171.8 million doses including all booster programmes Overall 1-in-112 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event, 1-in-151 reports are classified as SERIOUS*, 1-in-195 reports are a fatality, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,316 (Pfizer-mono) + 4096 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,600 (AZ) + 42,833 (Moderna-mono) + 5108 (Moderna-bivalent) + 57 (Novavax) + 2319 (Unknown brand) = 478,329 people impacted (increase of 776 in 4 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.4% 124,617 (Pfizer-mono) + 3126 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,644 (AZ) + 30,929 (Moderna-mono) + 3685 (Moderna-bivalent) + 40 (Novavax) + 1670 (Unknown) = 355,711 Over 45,857 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 9.6% of all reports Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.1% 50,832 (Pfizer-mono) + 940 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,592 (AZ) + 11,816 (Moderna-mono) + 1381 (Moderna-bivalent) + 17 (Novavax) + 581 (Unknown) = 120,159 Reactions - 508,104 (Pfizer-mono) + 10,867 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 877,221 (AZ) + 140,373 (Moderna-mono) + 13,896 (Moderna-bivalent) + 178 (Novavax) + 7217 (Unknown) = 1,557,856 Fatal - 867 (Pfizer-mono) + 30 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1364 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna-mono) + 42 (Moderna-bivalent) + 68 (Unknown) = 2459 (0.5% of reports) (increase of 23 reports with fatal outcome in 4 weeks) Over 386 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 16% of all fatalities CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.3% 4650 (Pfizer-mono) + 34 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 517 (Moderna-mono) + >7 (Moderna-bivalent) + >32 (Unknown) = 6697 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,965 (Pfizer-mono) + 103 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,542 (AZ) + 4973 (Moderna-mono) + 127 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 91 (Unknown) = 39,801 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 15 (Pfizer-mono) + <5 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = greater than 43 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

This is Not On The Beeb's 76th Adverse event report. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 29th MARCH 2023 New interactive format data Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses - one or more booster - 40.6m (up to Feb 2023) Additional all-brand doses given in last 5 weeks - 324 (Pfizer-mono) + 9453 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna-mono) + 1655 (Moderna-bivalent) = 11,441 65.7% (15,098,879 out of 22,970,162) people aged over 50 years old (England only) had an Autumn booster since Sept 2022 (UKHSA National Flu & Covid-19 Surveillance Report - week 14) Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,495 (Pfizer-mono) + 4237 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,764 (AZ) + 42,863 (Moderna-mono) + 5165 (Moderna-bivalent) + 66 (Novavax) + 2372 (Unknown brand) = 478,962 people impacted (increase of 633 in 5 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.4% of all reports 124,777 (Pfizer-mono) + 3242 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,793 (AZ) + 30,959 (Moderna-mono) + 3735 (Moderna-bivalent) + 46 (Novavax) + 1716 (Unknown) = 356,268 Over 45,936 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 9.6% of all reports Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.1% 50,848 (Pfizer-mono) + 962 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,603 (AZ) + 11,815 (Moderna-mono) + 1389 (Moderna-bivalent) + 20 (Novavax) + 584 (Unknown) = 120,221 Overall 1-in-112 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event (assuming one person submits only one report) 1-in-151 reports are classified as SERIOUS* 1-in-194 reports are associated with a fatality, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Reactions - 508,972 (Pfizer-mono) + 11,257 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 878,138 (AZ) + 140,628 (Moderna-mono) + 14,060 (Moderna-bivalent) + 215 (Novavax) + 7340 (Unknown) = 1,560,610 Fatal - 870 (Pfizer-mono) + 33 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1368 (AZ) + 89 (Moderna-mono) + 41 (Moderna-bivalent) + 72 (Unknown) = 2473 = 0.5% of reports (increase of 14 reports with fatal outcome in 5 weeks) Over 390 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 15.8% of all fatalities, and 135 are of ‘Unknown Sex’ = 5.5% of all fatalities CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.4% 4658 (Pfizer-mono) + 36 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 517 (Moderna-mono) + 7 (Moderna-bivalent) + 33 (Unknown) = 6708 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,975 (Pfizer-mono) + 110 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,544 (AZ) + 4973 (Moderna-mono) + 128 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 91 (Unknown) = 39,821 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 15 (Pfizer-mono) + <5 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = greater than 43 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

I think we'd all agree on the answer. Here is a new petition to support. "Require MPs and parliamentary candidates declare any links with lobbying groups. We want MPs and parliamentary candidates to be required to declare any links with lobbying groups. This must be provided alongside and in addition to the existing requirements that parliamentary candidates declare the party they stand for, and MPs declare financial interests. Declaration of any previous, current or planned association with any lobbying organisations (public or private) must include but not be limited to any form of: affiliation, attendance, training, graduation or actual membership. We believe the British Electorate have a legitimate expectation of being made fully aware of all current MPs and parliamentary candidates associations with lobbying groups. These associations could influence the actions of current and future MPs, and this information should therefore be available to inform the voting decisions of the British electorate." https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/634735 Please sign and share very widely: Note: All MPs will be emailed to ensure that they are made aware that this Petition focuses on any associations with the World Economic Forum and Common Purpose (neither of which can be specifically named in the wording of a Parliamentary Petition). Do email your own MP yourself with the petition link to let them know that this Petition focuses on associations etc with the World Economic Forum and Common Purpose.

This is a biggie. The tide is turning, even if it feels controlled and curated. There seems to be a move afoot to slowly drip-feed the horrific realities of the C19 vaccine injuries and deaths, The facts that so many of us have been screaming about from the rooftops since day one. The question is why now as we enter the year's second quarter with April's Fool's day? On the 30th of March, a small report on the BBC regional Look North programme acknowledged lawyer's efforts to prosecute on behalf of the victims of the Astra Zeneca jab - nicknamed the "Clot Shot". BTW - The NOTB video comparing the BBC's report to NOTB's previous reports was banned immediately on youtube earlier today. VIDEO - THE BBC REPORTS ON V-INJURY 21 MONTHS AFTER NOTB REPORTS FROM VACCINE INJURY DAY IN JUNE 2021 OUTSIDE BBC Sign our petition here >>>www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/999 ONS INSIDER WHO HAS SEEN THE DATA CLAIMS BLOOD CLOTS ARE THE LEAST OF THE WORRY... The screenshots below are from an informal chat with an ONS insider. They hint that the 'The National Big Vaccine Injury Reveal' is aimed for the 6th of April. These informal messages were posted on the 17th of February 2023. TRANSCRIPT 02/17/23 (Fri)06:31:45 "...ONS bod here. This decision was made because of money not health sadly. There will be data being released by the ONS (Government Office of National Statistics) at the start of April that-shows not only are the mRNA vaccines not safe and effective but that it basically doesn't work. UK data shows that it's only mildly effective at reducing symptoms and even then only for a period of 2-6 weeks. It also has zero effect on transmission The primary reason for banning the boosters and reducing the availability of the mRNA vaccines to highly at-risk people only is that it's costing the NHS MUCH more to treat vaccine side effects than it costs to vaccinate. It's not a health the decision, it's purely about money.." TRANSCRIPT 02/17/23 (Fri)07:29:42 "...Its actually much worse than that, the clots are a very small problem compared to the reduction in fertility and the 2 big health issues. We basically have immune system failure in 30-35% of the vaccinated and heart problems in 10-15% of them. The UK government will have to acknowledge this when the data gets released at the start of Q2, usually 6th April. Or maybe they won't acknowledge, maybe they will just ignore and hope people don't notice as has been the modus operandi so far..." TRANSCRIPT 02/17/23(Fri)08:40:23 "..I'm not trolling, I actually work for the ONS as a Sys Admin and I'm responsible for the systems that store and analyse the data. The data release are compiled 3 months in advance so I get the chance to have a look and see the reports before they get published.."

They are at it again. The British Public have said no thanks to ID cards multiple times. Yet in the winter of 2023, as the British people are distracted by crippling fuel bills and rising food costs, the UK government are stealthily moving forwards to imposing the most draconian surveillance system seen to date, of which digital Identity cards are a key part alongside the upcoming central bank digital currency (CBDC) (More on the CBDC in upcoming articles and newsletters. Subscribe to them for free here) The 'powers-that-be' want digital identity cards introduced for the very reasons we don't want them. We want privacy, personal independence and freedom - the cornerstones of what we expect within a liberal western democracy. They want control. These authorities want total surveillance in the same way a possessive partner might wish to track their other half's location, spending and messages. Privacy and independence are basic human rights. “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Article 1 In the UK we value our basic rights where we are innocent until proven guilty. This is the foundation of our society. ID cards, digital surveillance and CBDC (digital government-tracked money) are systems designed to monitor, track and control us based on a presumption of mistrust. The irony is that the very individuals within our society, who have left trails of destruction deserving the highest levels of mistrust, are the very same politicians and 'uncivil' servants attempting to bring in these new laws. We all appreciate basic levels of privacy. We keep our bank accounts private for a reason. Few of us broadcast our locations unless it involves pride like sharing pictures from a good holiday or sharing our witnessing of a key event. If we don't wish even our most loved ones to have constant access to our finances, location and health/education/work records, why would we let any licensed governmental department or 3rd party have access to search our records? Of course, these infringements on our freedoms are sold as if for our benefit. Vague notions of safety, fears of (often fabricated) terrorism, or disgust with paedophilia, are emotions that are manipulated to gain our capitulation to this creep towards totalitarianism. Historically, in the UK there have been two national ID schemes. In WW1 the national register was used to conscript young men to face the machine guns of the mud trenches of the western fronts. In WW2, the ID scheme was sold to the public as a way to stop bigamy. We are now in WW3 whose main weapons are propaganda and information whose target is not to win territory old school style, but to 'win' and gain the minds of the human race. The reason behind this power grab is for one group of people enacting a power grab to control another. “An equal has no dominion over an equal.” (Par in parem imperium non habet. – Black’s Law Dictionary 7th Edition page 1673) It appears that the civil servants we elected to divvy up our taxes and spend them wisely for the good of the nation's people, have become control freaks with dangerous superiority complexes. It also seems apparent they are working for the interests of corporations and unelected 'invisible' third parties shamefully alongside our own intelligence agencies developed to protect our interests. If 'the government' and 'the people' were a married couple who turned up for counselling, the government would quickly have a restraining order placed on them and be packed off for rehabilitation whilst scholars would be updating the historical archive with the record-breaking boundary-smashing depravity of the mass gas-lighting of millions of innocents. Sadly, the government are not going to enter the counselling they need, and the British people now need to stand together and stamp out these embers of tyranny before the fire of despotism spreads. WHAT IS THE DIGITAL IDENTITY PROPOSAL? The full 'proposal' can be read here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification It is unsurprisingly long-winded and over-complicated, to say the least. In the next section, I am drawing attention to one small area under the DBS. First, here are the governmental bodies that will have access. Note the possible provision for the data to be accessed by "...An organisation which provides services to a specified public authority in connection with the specified objective..." Is this a backdoor allowing third-party organisations and companies to access our data? WHO WILL CURRENTLY SHARE THIS DATA English and UK-wide bodies Home Office Ministry of Justice The Lord Chancellor Ministry of Defence HM Revenue and Customs Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities Department for Education Department for Work and Pensions Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. HM Land Registry An organisation which provides services to a specified public authority in connection with the specified objective A county council in England A district council in England A London borough council A combined authority established under section 103 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 The Common Council of the City of London in its capacity as a local authority The Council of the Isles of Scilly The Greater London Authority Welsh bodies The Welsh Ministers The Welsh Revenue Authority A county council in Wales A county borough council in Wales A community council in Wales A person providing services in connection with a specified objective (within the meaning of section 35) to a specified person who (a) falls within this part of this Schedule; and (b) is a public authority. Scottish bodies The Scottish Ministers A council constituted under section 2 of the Local Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. A person providing services in connection with a specified objective (within the meaning of section 35) to a specified person who (a) falls within this Part of this Schedule; and (b) is a public authority. New public authorities to be added to Schedule 4 The Cabinet Office Department for Transport Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Disclosure and Barring Service Disclosure and Barring Service These guys are interesting Please pay attention to the last words of condition 3. condition 1: the purpose is the improvement or targeting of a public service provided to individuals or households, or the facilitation of the provision of a benefit (whether or not financial) to individuals or households; condition 2: the purpose is the improvement of the well-being of individuals or households; and condition 3: the purpose is the supporting of the delivery of a specified person’s functions, or the administration, monitoring or enforcement of a specified person’s functions This incorporates what they call an individual's right to work or rent. The "The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS)" will be one of the new bodies accessing the sharing of data. Employers and landlords will retain obligations that they must comply with under the Schemes, including to satisfy themselves that the IDSP has carried out an identity check on the employee/tenant, and to retain copies of the check. SOURCE The right to work and pay for a roof over our heads is fundamental and independent of all other factors. This is not a rating system of good tenants - we already have such measures in place - this is about cancelling individuals from society. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article23 Who else will be targeted? They will tell you criminals or terrorists, but even these definitions are being blurred as we speak. Vaccine-injury-awareness activists such as myself have been labelled anti-vaxxers and are now facing attempts to be labelled as terrorists. "...Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers..." Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 19 If this doesn't alarm you, best research the developments in existing social credit systems and see how it will affect everyone within the 'social-credit-society', QUOTE: "....China's 'social credit' system ranks citizens and punishes them with throttled internet speeds and flight bans if the Communist Party deems them untrustworthy. The exact methodology is a secret — but examples of infractions include bad driving, smoking in non-smoking zones, buying too many video games, and posting fake news online, specifically about terrorist attacks or airport security. Other potential punishable offenses include spending too long playing video games, wasting money on frivolous purchases, and posting on social media. China has already started punishing people by restricting their travel, including banning them from flights. Authorities banned people from purchasing flights 17.5 million times by the end of 2018, according to the National Public Credit Information Centre, as the Guardian reported. They can also clamp down on luxury options — many are barred from getting business-class train tickets, and some are kept out of the best hotels. According to Rachel Botsman, an author who published part of her book on tech security on Wired in 2017, the government will throttle your internet speeds as a punishment, though the exact mechanics still haven't been made clear. According to Foreign Policy, credit systems monitor whether people pay bills on time, much like financial credit trackers — but also ascribe a moral dimension. You or your kids could also miss out on the best jobs and schools — seventeen people who refused to carry out military service in 2017 were barred from enrolling in higher education, applying for high school, or continuing their studies, Beijing News reported. And in July of 2018, a Chinese university denied an incoming student his spot because the student's father had a bad social credit score for failing to repay a loan. You could also get your dog taken away. The eastern Chinese city of Jinan started enforcing a social credit system for dog owners in 2017, whereby pet owners get points deducted if the dog is walked without a leash or causes public disturbances...." SOURCE Investigative Journalists have also been placed under what is basically house arrest by local corrupt politicians by having their access to digital money and travel curtailed -all without a trial. WHAT CAN WE DO? Here are three ways to voice your opinion regarding the UK gov proposals. 1 - OFFICIAL GOV FEEDBACK SURVEY This survey has a set list of questions that can only be answered by multiple choice https://surveys.domains.gov.uk/s/c0zd81 Save Our Rights have made a step-by-step template that suggest certain answers to the survey. "...All answers presented are merely suggestions on the basis that the person completing the consultation is opposing the Digital IDs. "Please use the written answers as inspiration and starting points." https://saveourrights.uk/digital-id-consultation/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=how_to_digital_id_consultation&utm_term=2023-02-08 However, the survey via the curated questions forces a narrative, meaning many of you might prefer to voice your protest independently. Here below, is a suggested email template to get you started... 2 - EMAIL SIDE STEPPING OFFICIAL SURVEY dea-data-sharing@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk Suggested letter format template. (Credit: This I believe was compiled by Anna de Buisseret) To the man / woman / artificial intelligence at dea-data-sharing@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk Regarding: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification Add date here: 2023 I the living man/ woman name: surname notice you and let it be known on record that; I do not consent to Digital ID I do not consent to Central Bank Digital Currency I do not consent to Digital Passports therein embedded vaccine passports, track and trace, mandatory vaccination, coercion, torture, genocide and terrorism. I do not consent to filling in this heavily biased online survey form that does not allow me to express my full opinions/objections to this draconian, tyrannical and evil slave tagging system. I am no slave, I am a living man/woman All of the above are designed to remove my God given freedoms and inalienable rights that no man shall take away. I require acknowledgement that my notice to you on this matter be placed on record and included in your survey. By: ___________________________ name :surname ALL-RIGHTS-RESERVED. WITHOUT-RECOURSE. NON-ASSUMPSIT - NON ASSUMPTIVE. “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). “An equal has no dominion over an equal.” (Par in parem imperium non habet. – Black’s Law Dictionary 7th Edition page 1673) 3 - WRITE & EMAIL MP Another powerful way to get the message across is meet, call or write to your own MP. Your own words are the most powerful. Here is a letter template that has been prepared by Save our Rights to use directly or to inspire your own version. To whom it may concern, I’m writing to express my significant concerns about the proposed digital ID verification system because I think it seriously jeopardises people’s fundamental human rights and liberties. I choose to draw attention to how inaccessible the consultation process is in the first place. It is unacceptable that those who are unable to access the online form—whether because they lack computer skills or have insufficient internet connectivity—cannot make their opinions known. Additionally, the survey’s questions are complex and beyond the expertise of the majority of respondents. Because of this, it is challenging for the general public to properly comprehend the ramifications of this proposal and effectively communicate their opinions. The government must make sure that everyone, regardless of technical proficiency or understanding, may participate in the consultation process. This consultation, in my opinion, violates the values of accountability and transparency, and adds to the concerns I have about the Digital ID itself. Moving on to the proposed system itself, I want to address a number of major concerns. Firstly, I have serious concerns about the types of data items the government plans to collect, access, store and share as part of this Digital ID. Having our personal information shared with the authorities, including name, address, date of birth, photographs, passport and licence numbers, and transaction data, is a clear infringement of the right to privacy guaranteed by the Human Rights Act of 1998. Furthermore, there is no assurance that this private data will be protected from hackers, data breaches, or other nefarious organisations, and I worry about the effects such a breach might have on people. Additionally, while it is not a named objective, the proposed system would enable the government to deploy facial recognition and Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras to track people’s movements while also monitoring their online habits. Both the right to privacy and the freedom of expression would be violated by this. The development of facial recognition and ANPR technology makes it possible for the government to have unprecedented control over people’s lives and to monitor and limit their behaviour, potentially through sanctions and restricted access to benefits and services. The effect that this proposal will have on vulnerable and marginalised communities also concerns me a great deal. Data sharing in this manner could result in discrimination and sanctions, especially for people who identify with any of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. The government must make sure that its plans adhere to the Equalities Act 2010 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and do not perpetuate or exacerbate current imbalances. However, I see little to suggest that the Equalities Act and GDPR will truly be taken into account therefore the conclusion is that the most vulnerable in our society are at risk from this proposal. I also doubt the true motivations behind this proposal. The government asserts that the digital ID verification system will enhance service delivery and decrease fraud, but I don’t consider that these are good enough justifications to infringe on people’s freedoms and human rights. Furthermore, I don’t think the proposal achieves its own objectives because the method by which the data would be gathered, stored, and used lacks transparency and accountability and any measure to assess its suggested benefits to individuals. Finally, I encourage the government to safeguard people’s freedoms and human rights by reconsidering this proposal. In my opinion, the proposed digital ID verification system must be considerably changed or abandoned entirely because it poses a serious risk to people’s rights and privacy. Thank you for your time and consideration, [Your Name] With this opening when forwarded to your local MP: Dear [MP] I’m writing to you today to let you know how deeply concerned I am about the most recent consultation on the suggested digital ID verification system. After carefully weighing the implications of this idea, I am convinced that it jeopardises our fundamental human rights and liberties. As a result, I vehemently disagree with this proposal, and I urge you to do the same. For your information, I’ve included a copy of my response to the consultation. I sincerely hope you’ll take my concerns into account. I hope you will stand up for the defence of our liberties and the safeguarding of our human rights as my elected representative. I want to draw your attention, in particular, to how difficult it was to access this consultation. Despite the significance of this consultation, it is clear that not all residents’ needs were taken into consideration while designing the online survey. I believe the complexity of the questions and the wording used in the online survey will have made it extremely difficult for many respondents to comprehend the full implication of the question and therefore their own response. This not only prevents a sizeable segment of the population from taking part, but it also casts doubt on the reliability of the findings. In a democratic society everyone must have an equal opportunity to share their opinions and participate in the decision-making process. I hope that you will consider these issues in your review of the consultation results and work to ensure that future consultations are more inclusive and accessible to all. Kind regards [Your Name] [Your Postcode] 4 - WORD OF MOUTH. TALK! Explain what is happening to your loved ones, friends and family. This is by far the most important thing you can do and what the powers that be fear the most. 5 - SHARE THIS INFORMATION Gain mass visibility to the issues. Share this post (or the work of other freedom fighters and organisations) adding a small personal introduction with your feelings and thoughts, as widely as you can. We are many. They are few. We can win this. Dream, live and fight for our freedoms. Defend our children's future. The seemingly impossible is possible. With best wishes Mark Playne 10-2-2023 DEADLINE FOR THIS ACTION IS 28th FEBRUARY MORE LINKS This is a massive attack on our privacy 2006 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_Cards_Act_2006 A historical look at UK identity cards https://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/identity-cards-in-britain-past-experience-and-policy-implications Obesity and social credit https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/chinas-social-credit-system-arrives-on-british-shores/

The parents of the vaccine injured have been doing their best to help other parents avoid repeating their mistakes. Gaslighted by the very industry that caused these injuries, who in turn then paid the world's most powerful marketing companies to invent and push the propaganda term "Anti vaxxer" in an attempt to quieten the parent's voices. This short little film was made by the parents of the injured children in 2012. If their voice had been heard 11 years ago, we might not have 80% of the population contributing to record-breaking excessive deaths as we are now seeing in 2023. A gentle loving tool to plant a seed of curiosity in parents considering vaccinating their babies. This was created by parents in the international Vaccine Injury community in 2012. Please share. English version See on youtube here: Arabic version See on youtube here Indonesian version

A member was asking me about his recent diagnosis and things he could do. I've sent similar 'leads' to many so figured it's about time to put them in a single post. Please bare in mind I'm not a doctor, meaning the below should not be taken as advice, besides it's against the law to say anything other than chemo or radio cure cancer. So, the below is just a collection of links to complement your research and conclusions. 😊 This is a work in progress as will take time to fill the sections. Please feel free to send me any relevant links/posts of your own. SUGAR & KETO https://naturalsociety.com/starving-cancer-death-removing-refined-sugar/ OXYGEN Hyperbaric chambers increase the blood's O2 levels. Cheap sessions can be booked in the UK via the SUPERB MS Society network of resources. This is one of the very few charities I'd back. https://www.mssociety.org.uk/about-ms/treatments-and-therapies/complementary-and-alternative-therapies/hyperbaric-oxygen-therapy https://killcancercells.com/cancer-researchers/warburg/ INDUCED FEVER Fever takes away cancer's protective camouflage enabling the immune system to tackle the growths. You can induce fever-like states with a long sauna or steam room stints. This is powerful https://bookinghealth.com/blog/diagnoses-and-treatment/diagnosis-and-treatment/501584-hyperthermia-effective-cancer-treatment-method-in-germany.html CLEAN SPRING WATER Way more powerful than you'd believe. Access it, use it, then reaearch to understand the whys. We all need 'structured' water! GLUTATHIONE Start here and ask me if you get lost on the trail... Www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/jg Tip: Don't buy Glutathione Don't buy NAC Do watch the above video and follow the links... VITAMIN C IV is best. Few can access it. Take small regular doses e.g 250mg Spread out small doses is very effective. If you can afford it buy liposomal ViT C If you cant afford it, make it! VITAMIN D3 High doses are needed. 4000iu is seen as the best daily amount,. Most people take tiny amounts. Nearly everyone in the western world is deficient.... Sunlight helps, but is not enough! B17 Apricot Kernels. More later... HEMP CBD was legalised for a reason. But why take one isolated cannabinoid when the plant has 120+? https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/hemp-versus-cbd ESSIAC More coming soon https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/patient/essiac-pdq TUMERIC https://www.turmericforhealth.com/turmeric-benefits/turmeric-for-cancer CHEMO The Greek Test There are 2000+ types of chemo poisons used to kill cancer cells... That also kills other cells and is one reason it is illegal to dispose of chemo down the loo! Many chemos are blindly given to each condition, yet many might be more effective on some people than others. The greek test works out which chemo your cancer is most susceptible to. The NHS will not use this as they have signed contracts. This needs to be a private test. IPT Chemo works by poisoning the cancer cells. The body is also poisoned. The hope is that as cancer cells are 'more hungry' and will consume more, they will be affected more. The limit is set by what your body can tolerate. The body needs 5 weeks to recover from this 'near-death' experience hence the time lag before your body is healthy enough to experience more chemo poisoning. Imagine a simple technique that targets the cancer cells and only uses 10-15% of the chemo. This is what IPT is. https://kotsanisinstitute.com/blog/what-is-insulin-potentiation-therapy Further research TRUTH ABOUT CANCER SERIES https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/ DIRT CHEAP PROTOCOL https://supplementpolice.com/dirt-cheap-protocol-for-cancer/

This is Not On The Beeb's 74th Adverse event report. The data concerned includes yellow card reports up until December 28th 2022. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY 25th JANUARY 2023 Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses/one or more booster - 40,598,344 people (up to end Jan 2023) All boosters = 67.16 million doses • Pfizer - 33.1m(monovalent) & 11.4m (bivalent) • Astrazeneca - 60,800 • Moderna - 13.3m (monovalent) & 9.3m (bivalent) • Novavax - 1,000 All-brand doses given in last 4 weeks - 9714 (Pfizer-mono) + 253,960 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1 (AZ) + 128 (Moderna-mono) + 11,333 (Moderna-bivalent) + approx. 1000 (Novavax) + ? (Unknown) = 276,136 Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,123 (Pfizer-mono) + 3882 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,410 (AZ) + 42,788 (Moderna-mono) + 5030 (Moderna-bivalent) + 48 (Novavax) + 2272 (Unknown brand) = 477,553 people impacted (increase of 1286 in 4 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.3% 124,449 (Pfizer-mono) + 2956 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,479 (AZ) + 30,891 (Moderna-mono) + 3616 (Moderna-bivalent) + 33 (Novavax) + 1628 (Unknown) = 355,052 Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.7% 51,674 (Pfizer-mono) + 926 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 55,931 (AZ) + 11,897 (Moderna-mono) + 1414 (Moderna-bivalent) + 15 (Novavax) + 644 (Unknown) = 122,501 Overall 1-in-113 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event, 1-in-152 reports are classified as SERIOUS*, 1-in-196 reports are fatal, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. TOTAL DOSES administered (approx.) = 171,738,100 doses including all booster programmes Reactions - 507,529 (Pfizer-mono) + 10,271 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 876,636 (AZ) + 140,149 (Moderna-mono) + 13,648 (Moderna-bivalent) + 137 (Novavax) + 7084 (Unknown) = 1,555,454 Fatal - 861 (Pfizer-mono) + 23 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1357 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna-mono) + 40 (Moderna-bivalent) + 69 (Unknown) = 2436 (increase of 32 reports with fatal outcome in 4 weeks) Over 378 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.3% 4634 (Pfizer-mono) + >29 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 518 (Moderna-mono) + >6 (Moderna-bivalent) + >32 (Unknown) = >6685 0-19yr old reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 28.6% 1990 (Pfizer-mono) + >6 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 400 (AZ) + 265 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + 16 (Unknown) = 2677 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,952 (Pfizer-mono) + 99 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,536 (AZ) + 4972 (Moderna-mono) + 124 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 90 (Unknown) = 39,773 20-29yr old reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 26.7% 8428 (Pfizer-mono) + 47 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 3873 (AZ) + 2065 (Moderna-mono) + 51 (Moderna-bivalent) + 27 (Unknown) = 14,491 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 14 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = 42 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

It's often not hard to work out 'who did it', though proving the real culprit is difficult unless you are a trusted Pulitzer-winning journalist with a superb track record and multiple high-level insider sources. Few of us believed the official narrative claiming Russia blew up its own natural gas pipeline and important source of foreign reserve income. Many of us guessed the real culprits. As Hersh says himself at the start of the video below, all he really did was lay down stronger foundations 'by deconstructing the obvious'. Just as in Obama's redline speech that foretold how the west would justify invading Syria, Biden has said simply - "we will shut down Nord stream 2 if Russia invades Ukraine." Biden threatens he'll shut down Nord Stream 2 pipeline if Russia further invades Ukraine VIDEO - 38 secs Also see on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWUuhNd37WI One of the most important reveals in Hersh's report is that the US laid plans for the blowing up of the pipeline 2 months before Russia invaded Ukraine. See the full interview with a concise summary and introduction by Democracy Now Pulitzer-winning journalist Seymour Hersh on "How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline" Interview by Democracy Now VIDEO 33 mins Also see on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4BuMaGlKp0 These are Hersh's key articles on Substack exposing the culprits and anticipating the backlash of denials and smears. How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline Seymour Hersh on substack 8th Feb 2023 QUOTE: "...The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now. The U.S. Navy’s Diving and Salvage Center can be found in a location as obscure as its name—down what was once a country lane in rural Panama City, a now-booming resort city in the southwestern panhandle of Florida, 70 miles south of the Alabama border. The center’s complex is as nondescript as its location—a drab concrete post-World War II structure that has the look of a vocational high school on the west side of Chicago. A coin-operated laundromat and a dance school are across what is now a four-lane road. The center has been training highly skilled deep-water divers for decades who, once assigned to American military units worldwide, are capable of technical diving to do the good—using C4 explosives to clear harbors and beaches of debris and unexploded ordinance—as well as the bad, like blowing up foreign oil rigs, fouling intake valves for undersea power plants, destroying locks on crucial shipping canals. The Panama City center, which boasts the second largest indoor pool in America, was the perfect place to recruit the best, and most taciturn, graduates of the diving school who successfully did last summer what they had been authorized to do 260 feet under the surface of the Baltic Sea. Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that, three months later, destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, according to a source with direct knowledge of the operational planning...." read more here SOURCE The Crap on the Wall Feb 15th Seymour Hersh on substack QUOTE: "...This a brief combat report from the battlefield here and abroad in the aftermath of the release last Wednesday of my story about Joe Biden’s decision to blow up the Nord Stream pipelines. First, many thanks for your interest in what the pipeline story was all about: a very dangerous Presidential decision. You are careful readers. I’m an old hand at dropping bombshell stories that are based on the disclosures of sources I do not, and cannot, name. There is a pattern to the response by the mainstream media. It dates back to my breakthrough story: the My Lai massacre revelation. That story was published in five installments, over five weeks in 1969, by the underground media group Dispatch News. I had tried to get the two most important magazines in America, Life and Look, to publish the story, with no success. Editors at both publications had earlier invited me to do some freelance writing for them, but they wanted nothing to do with a story about a massacre committed by American soldiers. It was a frightening time for me, in terms of my faith in the profession I had chosen. I was allowed to read and copy by hand much of the Army’s original charge sheet accusing a sad sack 2nd Lieutenant named William L. Calley Jr. of the premeditated murder of 109 “Oriental” human beings. I also had tracked Calley, the Army’s only suspect, and interviewed him at.... read more here. SOURCE WHY IS A PULITZER PRIZE-WINNING JOURNALIST USING SUBSTACK? Feb 8th Seymour Hersh on substack QUOTE: "...I’ve been a freelancer for much of my career. In 1969, I broke the story of a unit of American soldiers in Vietnam who had committed a horrific war crime. They were ordered to attack an ordinary peasant village where, as a few officers knew, they would get no opposition—and told to kill on sight. The boys murdered, raped and mutilated for hours, with no enemy to be found. The crime was covered up at the top of the military chain of command for eighteen months—until I uncovered it. I won a Pulitzer Prize for international reporting for that work, but getting it before the American public was no easy task. I wasn’t an established journalist working for an established outfit. My first story, published under a barely existent wire service run by a friend of mine, was initially rejected by the editors at Life and Look magazines. When the Washington Post finally published it, they littered it with Pentagon denials and the unthinking skepticism of the rewrite man. I’ve been told my stories were wrong, invented, outrageous for as long as I can remember—but I’ve never stopped. In 2004, after I published the first stories about the torture of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib, a Pentagon spokesman responded by calling my journalism “a tapestry of nonsense.” (He also said I was a guy who “threw a lot of crap against the wall” and “expects someone to peel off what’s real.” I won my fifth George Polk Award for that work.) I’ve put in my time at the major outlets, but was never at home there. More recently, I wouldn’t be welcome anyway. Money, as always, was part of the problem. The Washington Post and my old newspaper, The New York Times (to name just a few), have found themselves in a cycle of dwindling home delivery, newsstand sales, and display advertisements. CNN and its offspring, like MSNBC and Fox News, battle for sensational headlines over investigative journalism. There are still many brilliant journalists at work, but so much of the reporting has to be within guidelines and constraints that did not exist in the years I was turning out daily stories for the Times. That’s where Substack comes along. Here, I have the kind of freedom I’ve always fought for. I’ve watched writer after writer on this platform as they’ve freed themselves from their publishers’ economic interests, run deep with stories without fear of word counts or column inches, and—most importantly—spoken directly to their readers. And that last point, for me, is the clincher. I’ve never been interested in socializing with pols or cozying up to money types at the self-important cocktail get togethers—the star-fucking parties, I always liked to call them. I’m at my best when I swig cheap bourbon with the servicemen, work over the first-year law firm associates for intel, or swap stories with the junior minister from a country most people can’t name. That’s always been my style. And as it turns out, it’s the ethos of this online community as well. What you’ll find here is, I hope, a reflection of that freedom. The story you will read today is the truth as I worked for three months to find, with no pressure from a publisher, editors or peers to make it hew to certain lines of thought—or pare it back to assuage their fears. Substack simply means reporting is back . . . unfiltered and unprogrammed—just the way I like it..." Seymour M. Hersh Washington, DC SOURCE JOIN SEYMOUR HERSH ON SUBSTACK HERE Is there another reason this story is being publicized? This is unverified but here for your interest.

This is a recent email from Dr Andrew Goldsworthy who is himself C19 vaccine injured. Hi Mark, Thanks for declaring yourself as an anti-vaxxer. (Andrew is referring to my comments in this article) You have a good reason for this. See the following link to today's John Campbell interview. It gives definite proof that, at least in some people, the COVID vaccines damage the brain and heart (and God knows what more) even in the absence of the COVID virus itself. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZhzWzoPB3M Best wishes Andrew Goldsworthy Jabs causing brain injury or neurological conditions? Nothing new here for those of us working in vaccine damage awareness. See the latest UK vaccine injury report here Here is a more defined glimpse of vaccine-Injury data from November 2022 JOHN CAMPBELL'S VIDEO: JAB CAUSING BRAIN INJURY

This is Not On The Beeb's 73rd Adverse event report compiled by the dedicated and fantastic Jenny Brown. Jenny is an independent healthcare professional with significant nursing experience. The data concerned includes yellow card reports up until December 28th 2022. Jenny has spent months of her personal time with her head deep in the MHRA stats producing easy-to-understand reports that NOTB have published from the start. These are her words on the new changes the MHRA have made to their reporting format as published in the CW. "...Just before Christmas, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) changed their manner of reporting of Yellow Card adverse events.In the first ‘Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting’ update of this year, published on January 13, the ‘suspected’ side effects of the ‘vaccines’ are presented in ‘interactive Drug Analysis Profiles’ (iDAPs), which they describe as ‘a new enhanced format of data visualisations’. They claim this provides ‘improvements in format, accessibility and data protection whilst allowing access to more data than has been published previously.’ Stripping away the jargon, charts, graphs and interactive selections have replaced the previous 387 pages of adverse event listing documents for all Covid ‘vaccines’. Delving into this new format with anticipation, my hope was to find more useful information to continue creating reports to help raise awareness of the impact of these therapies. Would this so-called upgrade in data representation provide more clarity, reassurance and transparency or create more concerns and obfuscation of the situation? I have been surprised and disturbed in equal proportions. Several themes emerge which I discuss before presenting an overview breakdown of data as can now be gleaned. 1. The MHRA has drawn a line under the initial ‘vaccine’ campaign Although the overall report and reaction totals are cumulative from the initial roll-out, the written information now almost solely focuses on the autumn 2022 boosters. Most of the previously regularly updated text and tables, with important historical data points from the last two years, are no longer available, meaning that important comparisons and context are archived. his obscures the deeper picture, as the MHRA introductory text continues confidently to report that there is no cause for concern in pregnant women, for fertility, when breastfeeding or for under-18s, and acknowledges only a very rare potential association for menstrual bleeding, myocarditis/pericarditis and reports which have a fatal outcome. Given the growing body of peer-group-published scientific research that arrives at a contrary conclusion, along with ever more concerned doctors and scientists calling a halt to the entire programme, this seems incredibly misleading. Once again, we are being asked to place blind trust in health authorities as the MHRA reassure us that ‘robust safety monitoring and surveillance continues to be carried out between publications’ and that they will ‘continue to communicate promptly on any updated safety advice when needed’ without any proof that this is happening at all, or how. 2. The MHRA finally admits that the majority of adverse effects are serious The new interactive format does provide a new and valuable insight into, and admitting the severity of, and is a belated disclosure of, the vast majority of individual reports submitted. This runs directly counter to what MHRA have consistently maintained that ‘Safety monitoring throughout the deployment showed that the most common adverse reactions for all the Covid-19 vaccines were mild and self-limiting “reactogenicity”-type events such as fever, fatigue and injection site pain.’ More than two years of close monitoring of MHRA’s own published data and summarising the Yellow Card reports has shown the numbers of adverse events rising beyond the tens of thousands for blood and nervous system disorders, for cardiac conditions including heart attacks and peri/myocarditis, for eye conditions, infections, for respiratory and immune conditions, for skin, reproductive and breast disorders, for psychiatric distress, and thousands of cases of anaphylaxis, strokes, haemorrhages and thrombosis, seizures and paralysis. Hundreds of people have become deaf or blind. Hardly mild reactions. In direct conflict with their ‘low risk’ reassurances, the MHRA explain their definition of ‘seriousness criteria for ADR reporting’, determined by a working group of the Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), ‘as 6 possible categories which are documented on the Yellow Card’. These are: · Patient died due to reaction · Life-threatening · Resulted in hospitalisation or prolonged inpatient hospitalisation · Congenital abnormality · Involved persistent or significant disability or incapacity · If the reaction was deemed medically significant. In addition to this, seriousness of reaction terms has been defined by the MHRA. According to this seriousness definition, the MHRA is now acknowledging that, overall, the Yellow Card Reports for all Covid ‘vaccines’ are classified as serious, totalling 74.3 per cent, with non- serious at just 25.2 per cent. The mismatch between this and their previous declarations that most Yellow Card reactions are mild is quite mind-boggling. 3. Data disguised under the pretext of confidentiality Prolific throughout the new format is the use of the symbol ^. MHRA explains ‘Where there are less than 5 reports, numbers have been replaced with a ^ in order to prevent patient/reporter identification in line with our duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters’. However, as no identifiable context is disclosed it would seem highly unlikely that confidentiality could or would be breached. This retraction of numerical information means that, for example, alongside the five suicides that we can see have been reported in association with the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’, we can no longer see the two suicides that we know are associated with Pfizer. 4. The new format obscures child data Although the new interactive format looks good and can be used to explore different combinations of reported information, it is a lot less accessible in many ways, most critically for data relating to children. The ‘under 18s’ category has been replaced with 0-9yrs, 10-19yrs, which mixes the outcomes for young school age children before the age of Gillick Competence (under 16), through that potential consenting framework in teen years, with the ‘fully competent’ young adult data. The under-18s category was never adequate and this is not the improvement we have been looking for. The public and medical community urgently require more transparency around the data impacting children, not least because, disturbingly, 71.3 per cent (a total of 6,673)of the 0 -19yr old reports are classified as serious against 28.6 per cent non-serious (2,675). Also alarming is the 0.1 per cent of 0-19yr old reports classified as fatal by MHRA, equivalent to greater than ten (see below). In addition, we still have more than 370 deaths reported as being ‘Age Unknown’. Why? How can the age of a person who has died be unknown? 5. Downplaying real-world relevance of ‘people’ negatively impacted By primarily commenting on the bivalent ‘vaccine’ reporting prevalence, the impression given is that the adverse event reporting rate is low at around 0.5 Yellow Cards per 1,000 doses administered. However, if we consider real-world terms, although 53.8million first doses have been administered across the UK, these are ‘people’ who have received one or more doses of a Covid ‘vaccine’. Although over 171million doses have been given, 476,267 Yellow Card reports – that represents nearly half a million people – have been filed, nearly 75 per cent of which, by the MHRA’s own definition, are serious. That’s nearly 354,000 people. With the presumption that one person completes one report regardless of dose number, approximately 1-in-113 people have been negatively impacted and 1-in-152 people having an experience classified as serious. Yet this reporting rate may well be less than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA itself, especially given the bureaucratic difficulties and time-consuming nature of Yellow Card reporting, as well as ignorance of its existence. 6. The MHRA still proclaims the effectiveness of the ‘vaccines’ despite the evidence Within the latest updated Yellow Card reporting introductory text, the MHRA persists with the statement: ‘Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from Covid-19.’ How can this possibly be when the UKHSA’s own data summary clearly demonstrates the ‘vaccine’ effectiveness drops significantly just months after a booster dose? Surely there are other valid ways to support our health and well-being? They also state that ‘The benefits of the vaccines in preventing Covid-19 and serious complications associated with Covid-19 far outweigh any currently known side effects in the majority of patients.’ And ‘Vaccines are the best way to protect people from Covid-19 and have already saved tens of thousands of lives.’ From our experiences in the real world, where is the evidence for these statements? And where is the evidence that the current excess mortality, running at 20.7 per cent above the five-year average (2,493 excess deaths for the third week in December 2022), and excess all-cause mortality in the most heavily vaccinated age groups, are completely unrelated to this topic? By implication, it appears to be expected and acceptable for a sizeable minority of people to experience a serious adverse event up to and including death and with long-term outcomes as yet completely unknown. Just how much more ‘serious’ does it need to get? MHRA Yellow Card reporting summary up to December 28, 2022 (Data published January 13, 2023) New interactive format Adult & Child – Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to September 11, 2022 – UK-wide (latest) · 1st doses received = 53.8million people · 2nd doses – 50.7m people · 3rd doses/one or more booster – 40,576,925 people All boosters = 66.86million doses · Pfizer – 33.1m (monovalent) & 11.1m (bivalent) · AstraZeneca – 60,800 · Moderna – 13.3m (monovalent) & 9.3m (bivalent) Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports 175,724 (Pfizer-mono) 3,538 (Pfizer-bivalent) 247,157 (AZ) 42,706 (Moderna-mono) 4,860 (Moderna-bivalent) 52 (Novavax) 2,230 (Unknown brand) TOTAL = 476,267 people impacted (increase of 2,249 in 5 weeks) Reports classified as serious by MHRA = 74.3 per cent 124,114 (Pfizer-mono) 2,667 (Pfizer-bivalent) 191,252 (AZ) 30,825 (Moderna-mono) 3,472 (Moderna-bivalent) 34 (Novavax) 1,592 (Unknown) TOTAL = 353,956 Reports classified as non-serious by MHRA = 25.2 per cent 50,757 (Pfizer-mono) 852 (Pfizer-bivalent) 54,557 (AZ) 11,796 (Moderna-mono) 1,356 (Moderna-bivalent) 18 (Novavax) 571 (Unknown) TOTAL = 119,907 Overall 1 in 113 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event 1 in 152 classified as SERIOUS* which may be less than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA. Total doses administered (approx) = 171,360,000 including all booster programmes Reactions 506,216 (Pfizer-mono) 9,319 (Pfizer-bivalent) 875,826 (AZ) 139,933 (Moderna-mono) 13,131 (Moderna-bivalent) 106 (Novavax) 6,838 (Unknown) TOTAL = 1,551,263 Fatal 853 (Pfizer-mono) 19 (Pfizer-bivalent) 1348 (AZ) 85 (Moderna-mono) 32 (Moderna-bivalent) 67 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2,404 (increase of 42 reports with fatal outcome in 5 weeks) 370 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ Children & young people special report Last available dose numbers dataset for under-18s in November 2022 · 4,213,500 children (1st doses) – majority Pfizer · 2,910,500 (2nd doses) – majority Pfizer · 485,900 boosters Yellow Card adverse events reported now 0-9yrs : 10-19yrs segments Below Combined 0-19yrs – many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports ‘in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters’ 0-19yr old reports classified as serious by MHRA = 71.3 per cent 4,634 (Pfizer-mono) >26 (Pfizer-bivalent) 1,457 (AZ) 518 (Moderna-mono) >6 (Moderna-bivalent) >32 (Unknown) TOTAL = 6,673 0-19yr old reports classified as non-serious by MHRA = 28.6 per cent 1,989 (Pfizer-mono) >5 (Pfizer-bivalent) 400 (AZ) 265 (Moderna-mono) <5 (Moderna-bivalent) 16 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2,675 0-19yr old reports classified as fatal by MHRA = 0.1 per cent >10 (Pfizer-mono) zero (Pfizer-bivalent) <5 (AZ) <5 (Moderna-mono) zero (Moderna-bivalent) <5 (Unknown brand) TOTAL = greater than 10 Full IDAP adverse event reports are HERE https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mhra-admits-74-of-vaccine-injuries-are-serious-but-still-insists-jabs-are-safe/ ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

Tired of important emails going into your junk folder? Follow these simple instructions to add me (or anyone else) to your safe contacts list. ​ Please remember I only want you to get my emails if you really want them. There is an easy one-click unsubscribe button at the bottom of every email. ​ Gmail - Mark messages as ‘Not spam’ Has Gmail has marked emails you wish to keep as spam? Tell Gmail the emails are not spam. 1. In Gmail, navigate to the spam folder.
 2. Select the email.
 3. Click More and then Not spam. ​ ​ How to add an email contact to your safe sender list. ​ Gmail 1. Open the email I've sent you. 2. Click on the little down-pointing-triangle-arrow next to “reply.” 3. Click Add mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk to contacts list to finish iOS Devices – iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch 1. On any message, tap the sender and add to either a new contact or an existing contact. ​​ Android Devices – Samsung, Google Nexus, others 1. In the default email client, touch the picture of the sender. 2. Click OK to add to contacts. ​​ Apple Mail 1. Open the email I've sent you. 2. In the email header, click on Mark Playne and choose 'add to contacts' from the dropdown menu. ​ Yahoo! Mail 1. Open the email from me. 2. Click Add to contacts next to Gabriel Lea 3. On the Add Contact popup, add additional information if needed. 4. Click Save to finish. ​ Windows Live Hotmail 1. Open the email from me. 2. In the email header, click on Gabriel Lea and choose 'add to contacts' from the dropdown menu. ​ AOL Mail 1. Click Contacts in the right toolbar. 2. Click Add Contact. 3. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 4. Click Add Contact button in the popup to finish. ​ Comcast 1. Click Preferences from the menu. 2. Click Restrict Incoming Email. 3. Click Yes to Enable Email Controls. 4. Click Allow email from addresses listed below. 5. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 6. Click Add. 7. Click Update to finish. ​ Earthlink 1. Click Address Book. 2. Click Add Contact. 4. Save mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk as a contact. 5. Click save. NetZero 1. Click the Address Book tab on the top menu bar. 2. Click Contacts. 3. Click Add Contact. 4. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 5. Click Save to finish. ​ Microsoft Outlook 2003 1. Open the email message from me. 2. Right-click Click here to download images in the gray bar at the top of the message. 3. Click Add Sender to Senders Safe List to finish. ​ Outlook 2007 1. Right-click on the email you received (in the list of emails). 2. Click Junk E-mail. 3. Click Add Sender to Safe Senders List to finish. ​ Outlook 2010 1. Click the Home tab. 2. Click Junk. 3. Click Junk E-mail Options. 4. Click Safe Senders. 5. Click Add. 6. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 7. Click OK to finish. ​ Mac Mail 1. Click Address Book . 2. Click File. 3. Click New Card. 4. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 5. Click Edit to finish ​ Mozilla Thunderbird for PC 1. Click Address Book. 2. Make sure Personal Address Book is highlighted. 3. Click New Card. This will launch a New Card window that has 3 tabs: Contact, Address & Other. 4. Under Contact, enter mark@markplayne.com 5. Click OK to finish. Mozilla Thunderbird for Mac 1. Click Address Book. 2. Make sure Personal Address Book is highlighted. 3. Click New Card. This will launch a New Card window that has 3 tabs: Contact, Address & Other. 4. Under Contact, enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 5. Click OK to finish

Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Biological Safety Officer and Professor at University College London (retired) sent his recent thoughts on the EMF link to Obesity. As always golden information... Hi Mark, I was struck by an article in the "New Scientist" that said that there has been a massive increase in obesity in the last few decades. There may be more than one reason for this, the most obvious being that we are spending too much time in front of our computers and have less exercise. But there is another and much more intriguing possibility. That is that electromagnetic radiation (especially at high frequencies) opens voltage-gated ion channels VGCCs) in the insulin-secreting cells of the pancreas. See https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/138/9/3735/2988096?login=false The effect of this would be to increase the amount of insulin in the bloodstream, which would in turn promote the more rapid uptake of glucose into our cells. Some would go into muscle cells, but there is a limit to what these can absorb. By far most will go into adipose tissue and make us fat and we could also become  Type 2 diabetics. Most type 2 diabetics can manage by taking carefully adjusted but lifelong doses of metformin, which blocks the uptake of glucose into their cells. In some cases, it may even make them lose weight but don't bet on it. An overdose may cause a hypoglycemic attack in which you may faint, go into a coma or worse. The take-home story is if you want to stay thin and healthy, steer well clear of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. Best wishes Andrew Goldsworthy

"...Health officials are investigating whethe 'Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal … represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public, as we have in the past, when one of our safety monitoring systems detects a signal,' a joint statement from the CDC and FDA said...." The CDC have now moved to squash this 'signal' that went viral. "...A preliminary link between Pfizer's Covid vaccine and an increased stroke risk in seniors cannot be stood up in further datasets, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have said. On Friday the CDC and FDA announced one of the four main databases used to track Covid vaccine injuries had detected an association between the updated bivalent shot and ischemic strokes in over-65s. The find came from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a near real-time surveillance system monitoring the safety of vaccines containing health records of more than 12 million Americans. It found that 130 seniors had the stroke within 21 days of the shot — representing 0.02 per cent of the roughly 550,000 seniors who received the shot. The agencies said it was 'very unlikely' the signal represents 'a true clinical risk' because it was only a tiny proportion of the group and the finding was not stood up in four other large databases that had a much larger sample size....' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11640813/Why-Pfizer-Covid-shots-stroke-link-flagged-CDC-FDA-likely-just-statistical-anomaly.html The CDC has played with data before producing more digestible statistics for the public as the film Vaxxed proved via a CDC whistleblower concerning the MMR vaccine. To look at the UK data see our translation of the MHRA yellow card reported reactions to the C19 vaccines here. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/1st-dec-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report-for-adults-children-notb-s-72nd-ae-report

This time last year you might remember I was working providing expert and vaccine injury witness evidence for the case with lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White and Mark Sexton known as police crime number: 6029679/21 Over 60 NOTB members that are vaccine-injured also submitted witness statements. Several key Doctors also submitted expert witness evidence. Multiple scientists submitted expert witness evidence. Thank you. Over 16,000 of you have also kindly backed Not On The Beeb petition (started in the summer of 2021) calling for a pause to the roll-out and investigation into the ingredients that we supplied to the legal team, as a public push backing the evidence. Thank you! (We are gathering momentum and will have more news on how the petition will again be used in the upcoming weeks.) LOIS IS NOW BEING HOUNDED BY HER LEGAL REGULATORY BODY. We need to let this body the SRA know that we believe all her work was for the good of the people of this nation. DETAILS OF SRA COMPLAINT Many of you will remember the 2022 winter push of Not On The Beeb using Lois's template letter calling for a stop to the C19 roll-out at schools. With your help 1000s of schools received countless letters. This work was crucial in awakening the headmasters and teachers to the impending crisis...and as we all know, this warning was highly accurate. THE LETTER 3rd February 2022 Dear Sir/Madam School Immunisation Service Visit: I write in connection with the visit or any proposed visit of the school immunisation service. As you will be aware whilst children are in school, the school’s legal position is “in loco parentis.” You owe a legal obligation to each child in your care. We ask that you do the following: Write to the SIS and inform them that the vaccination session or any proposed vaccination session is cancelled and that the reason for cancellation is that the SARS CoV2 injection is under police investigation. Should you fail to cancel the immunisation session you will render yourself liable for any losses sustained as a result of the visit and liability could include criminal liability. Informed consent is impossible to obtain as the SIS vaccinators are not: Informing the patient that the roll out of the SARS CoV2 injections are under Police investigation pursuant to crime reference number: 6029679/21. Most parents, if given that information, would decline to give consent for their child. Please ensure this letter is communicated to all parents. Part of the Police investigation revolves around the alleged unlawful suppression of alternative treatments which have a far better safety profile. Informed consent is not possible if there is no discussion around safer alternatives. Informing the patient of how much active ingredient is in each vial. The amount of active ingredient in each vial varies and it is a matter of public record that some batches kill and maim disproportionately. Witness statements will be considered by the Police from bad batch victims. By way of example; one of them is now infertile, others have been suffering with mobility and paralysis of the face and limbs and many others are suffering from serious heart conditions such as myocarditis/pericarditis/myopericarditis. These people have medical evidence which states that the injection caused the infertility, immobility, paralysis and heart conditions. It is a fact that they received bad batches. As informed consent is impossible to obtain, anyone injected on site has suffered a battery, regardless of any injury sustained. Can you come back to me confirming that the visit has been cancelled. Yours faithfully Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk SRA CLAIM Lois sent three such letters to Schools, GPs and Vaccine centres The SRA are planning a tribunal based on: The letters were 'reckless' The letters were 'against the public interest' The letters were 'anti-covid legislation and anti-government.' The letters' claims were unsubstantiated. HOW CAN YOU HELP LOIS? Please send an email as a complaint to the SRA Only a few words are needed, yet more detail adds more punch. Write as you see valid. Each and every complaint will help her greatly. Email details are below The deadline has been shifted to the 17th January 2023. TAKE ACTION Please send an email to the SRA using these details. (You can also click the link on Lois's page here to launch an email: http://stellion.com/loisbayliss/) Email: contactcentre@sra.org.uk complaintsreview@cedr.com Essential to CC Lois in: claims@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk If you'd like Mark & NOTB to get a copy to publish with your intials CC in: NOTB-ACTION@pm.me Subject line: Official complaint against SRA & demand to withdraw actions re: SRA ref: RGC-000072045 Text: (These are suggested words as an introduction but please feel free to use your own) I hereby lodge an official complaint against the SRA on the basis detailed below. Further, I wish to demand that the SRA withdraw their current and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss. Details of Complaint: WHO IS LOIS BAYLIS? Lois Bayliss is a solicitor in England who has for almost two years been a champion of the people. She has worked throughout that time on a pro bono basis, receiving no payment whatsoever for the sterling work which she has carried out in providing a voice for those who have felt disadvantaged, forgotten and who have all but lost hope, when few others in her position would step up to help Here are just some of the things Lois has done; Gathered an immense amount of expert evidence which calls into serious doubt the Governments policies relating to the management of C19 and the C19 injections and their rollout Spoken up in support of those injured by C19 injections Assisted families in Court proceedings seeking to prevent C19 injections Delivered evidence and witness statements relating to harms and deaths likely to have been caused by C19 injections to UK police forces Submitted whistleblower and expert evidence to police Facilitated letters concerning injections and masking to schools, injection centres and GP surgeries Assisted PJH Law with care worker jab mandates, NHS mandates and assisted on the High Court case of Dr Sam White Was prepared to assist in the representation of NHS workers receiving 1324 enquiries prior to the withdrawal of the C19 injection mandate Was very active in the case against the MHRA with PJH Law Provided guidance to individuals and families based upon the expert opinions and evidence in her possession, as well as her professional legal expertise as a solicitor at no charge whatsoever Has on several occasions paid barristers fees herself in order to assist those less well off financially and who have required Court actions THE REGULATOR STEPS IN A body which regulates the legal profession in England, The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), placed Lois under investigation early in 2022, after claiming to have received a number of complaints about the work she has been doing for people. To date, the SRA have failed to provide Lois with copies of any of these apparent complaints received. In November 2022, the SRA served a Notice on Lois, advising that they were proposing to refer Lois to The Solicitors Discipliniary Tribunal (SDT) due to the work which she has carried out. The SRA have notified Lois that she may be responsible for their investigation fees, which could run to hundreds of thousands of pounds. In fact a relatively recent such case, levelled a costs claim of over £300,000 on a solicitor. Many people believe that what the SRA are subjecting Lois to is wrong and that their action should be withdrawn immediately. If you think the SRA should withdraw their action and instead commend and support Lois for the great work she has done in the public interest, please send them an email (which will auto-copy to Lois’s Law Firm, Broad Yorkshire Law) by using the link below…and let them know your views… PETITION TO STOP JAB ROLL-OUT We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. ​ 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, most of the adverse reactions can be attributed to a few of the batches. This clearly indicates at the best suspect manufacturing. THANK YOU - PLEASE SHARE THIS PAGE AND PETITION

Defender of the people Lois Bayliss is under attack by her solicitors regulatory body the SRA over letters she wrote to schools, GPs and Vaccination centres. Read the post 'Lois Baylis needs our help' to understand the issue Lois is facing. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/lois-bayliss-needs-our-help (You also see how to file a complaint here) Would you like to register your disdain for the SRA actions and make an official complaint? See how to do so here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/lois-bayliss-needs-our-help Below are a few sample complaints filed against the SRA by NOTB members. ----------------------------------- Dear sir or madam I am writing to express my disgust that you wish to discipline Lois Bayliss in front of a tribunal. In my opinion the SRA is undermining legal authority in this jurisdiction. Law and government is based on consent, and the removal of rights and freedoms of people will directly lead to the removal of their consent to be governed, in a manner that is not in accordance with human nature. The actions of the SRA are 'reckless' and against the public interest. The actions of the SRA are in favour of corporate interests, could there be any possible reasons as to why the legal system favors corporate interests over the interests of the ones the government and corporations are supposed to serve? The letters written by Lois were 'anti-covid legislation and not anti-government. If government legislation is flawed, discriminatory and dangerous, writing a letter is upholding ones moral duties? It is my understanding that the opinions of SRA are unsubstantiated, and not based on the best scientific research protocols whereby all sources of information are taken into account. Please provide information as to how the STA bases its decisions on science? It is incredibly worrying and suspect that our moral and legal authority can so readily be put in the hands of a few industrial scientists with many conflicting interests. It is even more worrying that this is encouaged by bodies that are supposed to protect a sound legal system. I would welcome a public discussion as to why it has been chosen to arrange a tribunal, who was responsible for this decision, and what the rules are within the SRA for this course of action. Yours faithfully WR ----------------------------------- Madam/ sir, I wish to request that the SRA withdraw their current, and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss. I was an NHS GP for nearly 50years, in different roles. Lois Bayliss drew attention to the dreadful way in which many people were treated during the covid troubles.  UK law ( Montgomery judgement of the UK Supreme Court ), medical ethics ( GMC advice on decision making and consent ) and the Nuremberg Code were all disregarded, in more ways than one.I have pointed this out to many worthies, and suggested to them that they report me to the GMC if I am spreading misinformation.                                                                       They have not done so, nor replied to me. The fact that this is not common knowledge is because the media and governments used censorship to support their 'case '.Lois Bayliss helped to overcome some of the consequences of that censorship.You should be proud that Lois Bayliss is a solicitor.Instead you are taking action against her. Yours sincerely Noel Thomas. MA  MB ChB DCH. DObsRCOG DTM&H. MFHom. ----------------------------------- Hello SRA I hope you are all well. Re: SRA ref: RGC-000072045 I am dismayed to learn that Lois Baylis is under investigation by the SRA alleging that it has received a number of complaints about Lois. Unfortunately the SRA has failed to substantiate its claims with evidence of the apparent complaints received.I hereby lodge an official complaint against the SRA on the points detailed below. Further, I wish to demand that the SRA withdraw their current and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss.It is essential to consider that Lois Bayliss is a solicitor in England who has for almost two years during, which our human rights and access to information has been severely curtailed, been a champion of the people. Lois has worked throughout that time on a pro bono basis, receiving no payment whatsoever for the sterling work which she has carried out in providing a voice for those who have felt disadvantaged, forgotten and who have all but lost hope, when few others in her position would step up to help KH ------------------------------------ Dear SRA representatives, Please withdraw the current and any proposed action against Lois Bayliss. I believe her work is for the good of people of this nation. Kind regards, J ----------------------------------- Dear SRA You will no doubt recognize my note as a copy & paste of a supporting campaign for the above-mentioned solicitor, whom I write to offer my complete support. To the details below, I would add the following comments, and respectfully & strongly urge you to desist from taking any punitive measures against this champion of the public. Her efforts to discover the details in this extraordinary situation should be supported, not condemned at any level. The management of the so-called Covid pandemic appears to me to be grotesque & deliberate government disinformation, manipulation of the public, concealment of important facts, and refusal to permit investigation of the terrible consequences. Consequently, you should support her efforts and her attempts to properly inform the public, and I trust you will do precisely that. Yours sincerely JHR ----------------------------------- Dear Sir/Madam, What on earth do you think you are doing, running a campaign of intimidation against Lois Bayliss, simply because she is working freely instead of charging ridiculous fees (thereby setting an example to other solicitors in what is, frankly, a profession that is devoid of transparent competition and characterised by protective regulation)? Have the SRA and its directors taken leave of their senses and become captive to governmental policy? Lois Bayliss is courageous and acts on principle. She is to be commended, in the same way as those who resisted, at the time, the govt propaganda and policies in Nazi Germany and the Eastern bloc countries. Why is the SRA intimidating her? For whom are you acting and on what grounds? Are the SRA and the profession not sufficiently aware of the deterioration in the manner in which they are regarded? The public need to know why the SRA are engaging in tyrannical activities of this nature, as an agency of government. Regards AM ----------------------------------- Dear Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) I am aware that you are investigating anonymous complaints against Lois Baylis as a result of the work Lois may have been carrying out. I find it hard to accept that to my understanding Lois has not been given the full details of the alleged anonymous reports against her to respond to prior to any investigations or cases being held against her. As a named woman I would like to say a few words in support of Lois Bayliss/Broad Yorkshire Law and the work they have completed during the COVID-19 Pandemic. I know Lois to be a very conscientious and caring individual, who has worked tirelessly to support people that have been subjected to difficult circumstances during the pandemic. Lois has worked courageously to support those people subject to Vaccination as a Condition of Deployment both within the care industry and NHS, she has ensured those people affected adversely by the COVID-19 experimental vaccines had a voice and were supported to complete witness statements (which can be a traumatic process for all those involved). I know Lois did this from a good place of caring and supporting those individuals that otherwise could not have afforded to be represented by a solicitor to address matters of great importance to them. On behalf of myself and the people of England I feel it important to say Lois represents as an ethical person who takes on anything to help people obtain the support and recognition that they need in their time of need. As a result I feel Lois should be commended for her tireless efforts to support the people of England in matters arising as a result of the policies and procedures adopted and encouraged by the UK Government, which at times meant people were under undue influence to either get vaccinated to keep their jobs or be dismissed. In addition, I know many people that have suffered adverse effects or worse as a result of taking the experimental jab. Lois had the ability and tenacity to represent people legally and lawfully. I would ask the question of how many people has Lois supported throughout these very difficult and trying times since 2021...there will be many many. I would strongly ask that the SRA takes into consideration recent events and data (amongst other things) which you are able to view as detailed below prior to coming to any conclusions on Lois case; - The Supreme Court in finding an outcome that this was not a vaccine (COVID-19) but 'gene therapy'. - Consider the increasing Yellow Card reporting data for adverse events and deaths. - Consider the amount of Employment Tribunal claims ACAS have settled early as a result of VCOD and/ or any claims within any UK courts for the mass harms of the COVID-19 policies including lockdowns etc. - Applications sent to the vaccine damage payments scheme in the UK. I hope following this case hearing Lois is allowed to continue to practice in her legal capacity to support those that need her help and to represent those people which otherwise are often left unrepresented with little access to the support afforded to them by Lois in there time of need. You never hear from people that wish to praise the work completed by Lois, I'm sure if you took the time to investigate thoroughly you would find the praise far outweighs anything of an anonymous negative nature against Lois. Kind regards NM Without ill will, vexation or frivolity ----------------------------------- Dear sir /madam , I read with dismay that Lois Bayliss has been vindicated by the establishment for her couragous work in the fight against the obvious tyranny of our treacherous government. I have forwarded a recent email I have now sent to the cheif executive of the NHS in Scotland . Please read the original email ( obviously the long one ) to see why Lois Bayliss has taken this route against what more and more citizens are wakening up to . I am just a normal 60 year old man with no affiliation to any political party or religon or any other movement for that matter. If you read my email you will find that everything I have written is true , truth is truth and cannot be manipulated despite what we are being asked to believe . When someone like Lois opens up the governments pandoras box they come down hard on them to destroy their character and their ability to carry on, that is not justice , that is treason and more and more citizens know what is and has been forced on us. Do the right thing today , if you have a moral compass, follow it, if not pay the price as the people will rise and the power will change direction against those hell democidal demons. Lois is brave ,are you ? respectfully , KM ----------------------------------- Dear Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Without ill will vexation or frivolity Notice to principal and or agent, is notice to principal and agent Reference: Lois Bayliss Solicitor Broad Yorkshire Law As a member of the public, I have been made aware that Lois Bayliss is currently subject to a Disciplinary Tribunal Panel. From the information I am in receipt of, I am of the understanding that the SRA has been in apparent receipt of a number of complaints all directed at Lois Bayliss since early 2022, of which you have elected to progress to disciplinary. It is my understanding that all the complaints share a parallel theme pertaining to her dedicated professional work pertaining to covid-19 vaccines and their ramifications that have a materialised timeline. I have been made aware that to current date you have not provided (and thus in effect have knowingly and recklessly failed to provide) Lois Bayliss with copies of these apparent complaints that have been raised against her. To proceed to disciplinary in the absence of providing the detail and evidence of the alleged complaints, is in essence subjecting Lois Bayliss to a Kafka's trial and Kangaroo Court. In the interests of justice this cannot be allowed to happen. It is a matter of public interest for people to know that such an important regulatory body abide by fair transparent process in matters of any investigation it elects to undertake and make judgment upon. The notable lack of impartiality with this disciplinary tribunal proceedings, suggests that the SRA is either not fit for purpose in being able to safely and fairly conduct disciplinary proceedings against any solicitor, or has a targeted agenda against Lois Bayliss as an individual for her work and time she has dedicated to serious issues pertaining to Covid-19 vaccines which are 100% matters of vital public interest to the people of this country. Subjecting Lois Bayliss to what in essence are anonymous allegations which could potentially be non- existent, false, and or fraudulent (unless proven otherwise with full disclosure of substantive and justifiable complaint information in writing) is painting a reasonable scenario to the everyday person that the SRA is attempting to serve back door detriment upon Lois Bayliss for being an exceptional solicitor who has helped so many people in matters pertaining to the catastrophic impact Covid-19 vaccines have had to so many people in the country in one form or another. Lois Bayliss has the right to help the people of this country in her professional capacity and private capacity, and should not be targeted for doing so. Lois along with other professionals nationally have collectively whistle blown on serious Covid-19 vaccine issues. It appears glaringly obvious to the reasonable person that the SRA's inability to abide by best practice with disciplinary investigative process with Lois's case, is demonstrating until proven otherwise a notable, targeted and underhand detriment at her for her dedication and commitment to helping as many people in this country as possible. In the interests of justice and the complete absence of any complaint evidence having been disclosed to Lois Bayliss , the SRA must cease and desist its disciplinary tribunal immediately. Continuation of the tribunal under such circumstances would lead the public to be reasonable in their opinion of the SRA being knowingly reckless in adopting unfair and prejudicial investigative practice skills to achieve a form of back door underhand punishment of Lois Baylis for her services to the people of this country, in the form of disciplinary and or loss of professional registration and or livelihood, and or being subject to paying the apparent costs of the SRA investigation process into her. One has to raise an obvious question, if you cant provide the evidence of apparent complaint, what has the SRA actually managed to investigate in respect to being able to try to recover any potential SRA investigative costs?? It therefore strongly appears that the SRA cannot be seen to be a trusted position of authority, because the sabotage of safe and best tools of investigative practice often points to abuse of positions and avenues of corruption. Having met Lois Bayliss personally, I have observed her professional conduct to be impeccable and would recommend her services to any friends and family as a result. As a solicitor, Lois is 100% a people person, which is a rare find in the legal arena. Her work ethics are genuine and responsive to individuals and their needs. RW -------------------------------- Dear Sir The SRA's reputation hangs in the balance because, as I understand, the SRA is planning a tribunal of Lois Bayliss based on her letters calling for a stop to the C19 roll-out at schools. The SRA is asserting that: 1.   The letters were 'reckless.' 2.   The letters were 'against the public interest.' 3.   The letters were 'anti-covid legislation and anti-government.' 4.   The letters' claims were unsubstantiated. Some years ago, I became unwittingly and innocently embroiled at the centre of the UK's largest corporate fraud case. I learned much from this experience, but above all else, I realised that analysing prima facia evidence takes significant effort and courage to highlight meaningful conclusions when it contests the mainstream. Given your organisation's profession and reputation, I am patronising you in making this last point. Still, I hope you understand my concern that you exercise discretion and review the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) own data about mRNA vaccines provided under FOI, links for which I have provided below my signature and a simple explanation for which I attached to this email. Covid vaccinations and injuries, according to the CDC's data, on which the UK government has relied, cause severe and fatal vaccine reactions, including cardiovascular, neurological and immunological reactions. Because of this, the risk-benefit ratio of covid vaccination in healthy children and adults under 50 years of age remains, at the very least, controversial and, some would argue, criminal. Please carefully consider the attached data regarding the COVID vaccines and recognise that there is a coming day when those in positions of authority, such as the SRA, who have failed to consider the data and are found to be on the wrong side of history, will be held to account. As a result of my analysis and those of many experts in their field, I now lodge an official complaint against the SRA on the basis detailed below. Further, I request that the SRA withdraw their current and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss. Details as I understand them: Lois Bayliss is a solicitor in England who has been a champion of the people for almost two years. She has worked on a pro bono basis throughout that time, receiving no payment for the sterling work she has carried out in providing a voice for those who have felt disadvantaged, forgotten, and who have all but lost hope when few others in her position would step up to help. Here are just some of the things I am informed Lois has done; Gathered an immense amount of expert evidence which calls into serious doubt the Government’s policies relating to the management of C19 and the C19 injections and their roll-out: Spoken up in support of those injured by C19 injections Assisted families in Court proceedings seeking to prevent C19 injections Delivered evidence and witness statements relating to harms and deaths likely to have been caused by C19 injections to UK police forces Submitted whistle-blower and expert evidence to police Facilitated letters concerning injections and masking to schools, injection centres and GP surgeries Assisted PJH Law with care worker jab mandates, and NHS mandates and assisted on the High Court case of Dr Sam White Was prepared to assist in the representation of NHS workers receiving 1324 enquiries before the withdrawal of the C19 injection mandate Was very active in the case against the MHRA with PJH Law Guided individuals and families based upon the expert opinions and evidence in her possession, as well as her professional legal expertise as a solicitor at no charge whatsoever Has on several occasions paid barristers' fees herself to assist those less well off financially and who have required Court actions I look forward to your informed reply. Thank you Ian Black (UK) +44 (0)7887 642054 Sources: Professor Fenton’s explanation You Tube analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr5tGOGkquc Epoch Times: https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/exclusive-cdc-finds-hundreds-of-safety-signals-for-pfizer-and-moderna-covid-19-vaccines_4956733.html Children’s Health Defence: CDC Finds Hundreds of Safety Signals for Pfizer, Moderna COVID Vaccines https://childrenshealthdefense.org/de... CDC Data revealed under FOI: 7.29.22 Table3 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Pfizer Compared to Moderna 7.29.22 Table 4 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Moderna Compared to Pfizer 7.29.22 Table 5 PRR of PTs for COVID19 mRNA Compared to Non-COVID 7.22.29 Table 3 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Pfizer Compared to Moderna 7.22.29 Table 4 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Moderna Compared to Pfizer 7.22.29 Table 5 PRR of PTs for COVID19 mRNA Compared to Non-COVID 7.15.22 Table 3 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Pfizer Compared to Moderna 7.15.22 Table 4 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Moderna Compared to Pfizer 7.15.29 Table 5 PRR of PTs for COVID19 mRNA Compared to Non-COVID UK gov: https://swprs.org/covid-vaccine-adverse-events/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0n-hUJM5n4&t=4s https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update... https://www.gov.uk/government/publica... Would you like to register your disdain for the SRA actions and make an official complaint? See how to do so here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/lois-bayliss-needs-our-help

STORY AT-A-GLANCE Twitter documents released by Elon Musk reveal the lawlessness of our intelligence agencies and the psychological warfare against the American public is far worse than expected Between October 2019 and February 2021 alone, FBI paid Twitter 3.4 million to censor certain views and stories on its behalf, including the damning Hunter Biden laptop story, which likely would have sunk Joe Biden’s bid for the presidency had it received the attention it deserved The FBI, Twitter and Facebook even ran a tabletop exercise about “hacked” information relating to Hunter Biden one month before the real story broke. During that exercise, they practiced the narrative that weeks later became “official truth” A large number of current and/or former FBI agents work at and with Twitter to keep the online narrative in check. More than 100 supposedly “former” intelligence agents also work in Facebook’s content moderation department While hunting down and banning covert propaganda accounts tied to foreign governments, Twitter worked with the U.S. Department of Defense to promote and protect American propaganda accounts, and aided U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots If you're still under the naively mistaken belief that there is no Deep State, the Twitter file dumps1 from Elon Musk detailing how Twitter, before his acquisition of the company, was coerced into doing the FBI's bidding, with actual FBI agents on its staff to control the online narrative, ought to set the record straight. In fact, the lawlessness of our intelligence agencies and the psychological warfare against the American public is far worse than most people ever expected. FBI paid Twitter huge sums of money — your tax dollars, might I add — to censor certain views and stories, such as the damning Hunter Biden laptop story, which likely would have sunk Joe Biden's bid for the presidency had it received the attention it legitimately deserved. The FBI even ran a tabletop exercise about "hacked" information relating to Hunter Biden ONE MONTH before the real story broke. During that exercise, they practiced the narrative (i.e., lies) that weeks later became "official truth." There is a Deep State running the show, and they're doing whatever they damn well please, without regard for the law or the U.S. Constitution. They're acting completely outside the rules of our Constitutional Republic and the laws of the land, and they've weaponized the very agencies that are supposed to protect us and act in the public's best interest and turned them against us. The Twitter files saga is expanding by the day, so I won't be able to cover every last detail here. Books will be needed to cover this scandal in depth. In the meantime, I suggest you review the references cited and keep your eyes peeled for later updates. FBI Used Twitter to Track and Spy on Americans In the video above, investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald reviews how Washington has expanded the war state and the Democrat’s censorship regime. About 39 minutes in, he begins reviewing evidence showing the FBI was not only censoring social media content, but the agency was also, on a regular basis, asking Twitter to reveal the location of specific Twitter users — for what purpose, no one knows. As noted by independent journalist Matt Taibbi in a December 17, 2022, Twitter post: "What 'law enforcement' objective is served by asking for Billy Baldwin's location information? Why is the FBI/DHS [Department of Homeland Security] in the business of analyzing and flagging social media content at all? When were these programs created and who approved them?" These are all good questions. Historically, the FBI's job has been to monitor and address criminal activity, not "misinformation." Somewhere along the way, and it's unclear exactly when the mandate changed and by whom, the DHS/FBI (the FBI supports the DHS by investigating threats) and other agencies tasked themselves with illegally suppressing free speech and shaping public narratives through public-private partnerships with Big Tech. The Biden administration's Orwellian "Ministry of Truth," revealed in the summer of 2022, was one of the first indicators we had that something was horribly amiss. And even though that agency was quickly disbanded after public outcry (and no small amount of mockery), the policing of mis- and disinformation was simply shifted elsewhere within the federal government. Moreover, as reviewed by Greenwald, internal DHS memos, emails and documents show the DHS has worked on expanding its influence over tech platforms for YEARS. So, government censorship is not something that "just happened" in response to the COVID crisis. Nor is the censorship limited to COVID or public health information in general. We now have evidence showing the FBI has actively interfered in multiple elections, for example — activity that Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) accurately warns is "the biggest threat to our constitutional democracy today."2 FBI Invented 'Foreign Interference' Narrative Not surprisingly, the FBI invented the narrative that foreign nations were interfering in U.S. elections, which is precisely what they were doing. As reported by Taibbi and attorney Jeff Childers,3 the FBI asked Twitter to investigate "malicious actors" spreading election disinformation on Twitter. Twitter looked into the matter and reported there was no evidence of foreign interference. The FBI was none too pleased with that answer and made it clear that Twitter better find some. As "evidence" that Twitter's investigation was flawed, the FBI cited mainstream media articles and think-tank reports that claimed foreign interference was indeed taking place.4 In response, Twitter's former censorship head Yoel Roth did an about-face and informed the team that "official state propaganda is DEFINITELY A THING ON TWITTER." How Media Have Been Weaponized to Provide False Evidence The FBI's tactic appears to be a variation of what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi calls the "wrap-up smear," where they leak a lie to the media, and then they use that media report as "evidence" that the lie is true, and it just goes in circles from there. Here, the FBI used reports — which were based on leaked information from anonymous intelligence agents5 — to pressure Twitter into making something up to further support the fiction the FBI itself invented and leaked to the sources they cited. As noted by Childers, this variant on the political wrap-up smear is also being used by U.S. health agencies:6 "It's a nifty trick … The NIH or CDC needs evidence to support some guidance they want to issue, like masking. So they fund some studies intended to show masks work. The pay-for-play scientists publish cartoonish, anti-scientific clown studies 'proving' cotton masks can somehow magically filter nanoscale virus particles. Then the NIH and CDC cite those same studies — the same ones they procured — to 'recommend' unconstitutional mask mandates, or even outright order mandates, like for air travel and on cruise ships. Ditto vaccines … It's a closed loop." Twitter-FBI Exercise: Managing the Hunter Biden Laptop Story We now also have evidence showing it was the FBI that quenched the Hunter Biden laptop story. They, in collaboration with Twitter, Facebook and the Aspen Institute, even held a tabletop exercise in October 2020 to practice the shaping of the media's coverage of a potential "hack and dump" operation involving Hunter Biden material.7,8 National security reporters from The New York Times and The Washington Post were also in attendance.9 As reported by the New York Post:10 "The exercise by the 'Aspen Digital Hack-and-Dump Working Group' involved an 11-day scenario in October 2020 that began with the imaginary release of falsified records related to Hunter Biden's controversial employment by the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, which paid him as much as $1 million a year to serve on its board when his father was vice president. 'The goal was to shape how the media covered it — and how social media carried it,' Shellenberger wrote. But the drill was put into practical use weeks later, when The Post broke the news about Hunter Biden's infamous laptop — which was either ignored or downplayed by most mainstream news outlets and suppressed by both Twitter and Facebook." In the video below, independent journalist Matt Taibbi speaks with Russell Brand about the Twitter files and the kinds of censorship tactics Twitter secretly engaged in on the government's behalf. However, it turns out the FBI didn't just attempt to sideline the Hunter Biden story a month in advance. No. They've been shielding it and working with social media to shield it for them, since 2018. As reported by Childers:11 "In December 2020, Twitter's former censorship head Yoel Roth explained in a sworn statement that for almost two years leading up to the leak, the FBI told him, over and over, to expect a Russian leak about Hunter Biden in October 2020: 'During these weekly meetings [since 2018], the federal law enforcement agencies communicated that they expected 'hack-and-leak operations' by state actors might occur in the period shortly before the 2020 presidential election, likely in October. I was told in these meetings that … those hacking attacks would likely be disseminated over social media platforms, including Twitter … [and] that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.' Facebook's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, made comments on a podcast suggesting he'd had similar conversations with the FBI." FBI Agents Assigned to Twitter Censorship Duty As reported by attorney Jeff Childers,12 FBI field agent Elvis Chan was one of the agents assigned to work with Twitter. He was recently deposed in the Missouri v. Biden case about his role in Twitter's censoring of Americans. Below is just one of Chan's emails to Twitter in which he directs them to ban specific accounts for imagined "crimes." As noted by Childers:13 "Note that Chan only provided a list of accounts. He didn't bother to say WHICH terms of service were violated. He didn't say anybody broke the law. He didn't even say WHICH tweets were problematic." Still, within 48 hours, Twitter had obliged, and the accounts listed by Chan had either been suspended or banned. Below is Twitter censorship employee Patrick Conlon's reply to Chan. As you can see, a long list of other FBI employees were also carbon copied. Another FBI "plant" is Jim Baker.14 Before becoming Twitter's head lawyer, he spent three decades with the FBI, most recently as its Deputy General Counsel. He too used his authority at Twitter to censor the Hunter Biden story. While his comment (see email below) may seem innocuous enough — just a polite suggestion — it's clear, with facts in hand, that Baker was trying to influence the situation. Intelligence Agencies Have Weaponized Social Media For the record, Facebook also employs no less than 115 "former" employees of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies.15 Most of them now work in Facebook's content moderation department, which seems like a massive career slide, if you ask me, but what do I know? As noted by Childers:16 "The inescapable conclusion of what we're seeing from the Twitter Files is that our country's intelligence agencies, by and through the FBI, now control all the large social media outlets … and are using them to manipulate American public opinion and change the outcome of domestic elections. But for whom?" My answer would be they're doing it on behalf of the Deep State, the same unelected globalists that so doggedly push for a Great Reset and Fourth Industrial Revolution (i.e., eugenics rebranded as transhumanism). Childers continues:17 "If Elon Musk hadn't spent $44 BILLION DOLLARS to buy Twitter, nobody would have ever believed the extent to which the intelligence community has absorbed private social media platforms in this country and turned them against the people. It's literally unbelievable. Exposure will probably be fatal. The Constitution does not provide for any internal security service in the United States. The agencies are WAY off the reservation, well into criminal territory, no matter how clever their lawyers are … Of course, we still have the teensy-weensy little problem of 'who' will charge and arrest these people, since they're in control of the entire federal law enforcement apparatus. Don't worry, there ARE answers. But let's wait a little bit and see how things play out." FBI Paid Twitter Millions As mentioned, the FBI was also using taxpayer dollars to pay Twitter for their censorship services — $3,415,323 to be exact, between October 2019 and February 2021 alone.18 FBI and other intelligence agencies were also trying to gain even greater and more direct influence over Twitter. In a January 2020 email, Carlos Monje wrote to Roth, warning that a "sustained effort by the IC [intelligence community] to push us to share more information and change our API policies." Apparently, the FBI wanted direct access into Twitter's database.19 Lies and More Damn Lies Investigative journalist Lee Fang with The Intercept20 has also provided us with some real bombshells. While Twitter has publicly insisted that it was cracking down on ALL covert government propaganda accounts, that was only partially true. Twitter worked with the U.S. Department of Defense to promote and protect American propaganda accounts, and aided U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots. In reality, Twitter worked with the U.S. Department of Defense to promote and protect American propaganda accounts, and aided U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots.21 They only hunted down the foreign government-affiliated propaganda accounts. As reported by Fang:22 "Behind the scenes, Twitter gave approval and special protection to the U.S. military's online psychological ops. Despite knowledge that Pentagon propaganda accounts used overt identities, Twitter did not suspend many for around two years or more. Some remain active … In 2017 a U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) official sent Twitter a list of 52 Arab language accounts 'we use to amplify certain messages.' The official asked for priority service for six accounts, verification for one and 'whitelist' abilities for the others." Whitelisted accounts have a "validated" status similar to that of the blue check mark, which ensures they are promoted in searches. These accounts also don't get shadow-banned or limited by other means. In closing, I think Childers makes an excellent and accurate observation:23 "Combine all this Twitter censorship, influence peddling, and pure propaganda with the vast budget for pushing vaccines by buying scientists and influencers during the pandemic, and we can begin to see the outlines of a vast private market for censorship and fake news created by the deep state, which then became its biggest customer." As for the FBI, it released a single-sentence "rebuttal" on December 21, 2022 — on Twitter — to the mountain of scandalous evidence presented against it.24 Orginal article: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/01/02/twitter-files.aspx?cid_source=dnlsubstack&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1Bttn&cid=20230102_si Sources and References 1, 7 Twitter Michael Shellenberger December 19, 2022 2 Rumble Glenn Greenwald December 19, 2022 Timestamp: 44:23 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13 Coffee & Covid 2022 December 19, 2022 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19 Coffee & Covid December 20, 2022 9, 10 New York Post December 19, 2022 18 Meryl Nass Substack December 20, 2022 20, 22 The Intercept December 20, 2022 21, 23 Coffee & Covid December 21, 2022 24 Coffee & Covid December 22, 2022

Youtube Influencer Dr John Campbell with 2.6m followers, who was pro-C19-vaccine during the initial C19 vaccine release, has finally come full circle calling for an end to the C19 vaccinations. Here is his video statement. To date, 53,813,491 or 78% of the British population has had one C19 jab or more. The injury rate is reported as 1 in 114 but we believe it is much closer to 1 in 10. Sign our petition We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. ​ 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing Who is Dr John Campbell? This was a trailer video for his channel. Listen to what he said about finding the truth... My question is why were we two years ahead of such an expert?

Numbers versus Words versus pictures If a picture is worth a 1,000 words, is a graph worth a million? This is the graph that in 2015 caused me to see through the "vaccines-have-saved-humanity-from-disease" myth and diverted my life-path. The graph shows that these diseases were falling dramatically before any vaccination was used. Scarlet fever is the perfect control, as no vaccine has ever been invented for it, yet the data shown proves the disease has followed the same exponential decline. What caused the declines? It was awareness of hygiene, clean water and sewerage that caused these declines. Plumbers not vaccines. Town planners not doctors. It was the labourers who built the water pipelines and those who managed and cleaned the sewers, not nurses. Not this... But this... Let's look at this recent graph on sudden deaths within Germany, paying attention to two key dates. When did Covid start? When did the vaccination programme start? Do we rest our case? I wish. Sadly war has never been waged on us involving facts, data or good science. It has been an information war using hypnosis and the most advanced propaganda techniques, run by government, military intelligence, media specialists and industry to produce 'religious-extremists', to whom science has become a concept, and real data an inconvenience, to beliefs backed by words not numbers and fact. Yet, in this case, the picture wins. The data presented graphically is demystified The graph speaks the truth that we need to know. We have written, spoken and screamed millions of words in apparent vain. A graph is worth a million of these words. Thank you for your analysis and graph Tom Lausen History of Silence Is this graph a surpise? Not at all. In the late Spring and summer of 2020 many of us 'medical activists' or 'freedom fighters' were number crunching the government data via the excess death figures, proving covid was not the direct killer that the media and government were having us believe. We now know 'end of life' protocols had been adapted using Midazolam to end many of our elderly's lives prematurely. The almost misuse of ventilators and the accompanying drugs in hospitals amounted to euthanasia in plain sight. Those of us deep in the research of prior vaccines, and aware of the wider agendas at play in 2020, warned of the danger of the upcoming 'vaccines'. Once released, we analysed the ingredients calling foul on illegal and undisclosed ingredients. We screamed about NOTB alongside other entities published every Yellow card report screaming as loud as we could that the data alone was shocking yet we knew the data represented barely 10% of the real injuries and deaths. Yet most of this fell on death or frightened ears. Why? We were heavily censored and not seen as authoritative sources. We called for Doctors to assist us in speaking out. Very very few did. They were afraid. They had money, jobs, pensions, private school funds and most of all, status to lose. More are now speaking out. We salute you. We need more of you to speak out, and quickly. Here is an excellent overview of the crisis and new data produced form Germany by Tom Lausen, explained by the Midwestern Doctor The Most Important Dataset of the Pandemic Was Just Released Germany Has Provided The Means To Quantify The Human Cost Of The Experimental Vaccination Program "...Most sane people believe that the burden of proving safety should lie on the party conducting a questionable action, rather than their victim. For example, if a criminal shot someone, the prosecution would not be required to prove that the victim’s sudden death after the gunshot wound was not just a spontaneous coincidence, a result of extreme stress from the situation, or due to a pre-existing medical condition. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical industry has been able to establish a special type of privilege within the legal system which has made it very difficult to demonstrate that vaccines (along with many other pharmaceuticals) can ever be at fault for anything. Because of this, we recently had a flood of experimental vaccines mandated upon the population, which were never tested for safety (despite many serious concerns with their design), whose (likely fraudulent) clinical trial data was never made accessible to the public. We then had, as far as I know, the most aggressive propaganda campaign in history, and I watched the majority of my colleagues lose the ability to recognize any problems related to the vaccines. Instead, they developed an almost surreal religious devotion to the coming salvation of the vaccines becoming available. Once the vaccines entered the market, a variety of red flags began going off indicating that these vaccines were killing people, and rather than address these concerns, the government—in concert with the media—chose to deny any of this was occurring. Instead they mandated the vaccines upon the entire population. I was understandably worried that the vaccines would cause problems and tried to do my part to head this off in 2020, but I did not expect anything on the scale of what we have encountered since then. I personally became involved in all of this because soon after the vaccines entered the market, I began to have many friends and patients reach out to ask me if the vaccine could kill as someone they knew had had a tragic sudden death after vaccination. Once the magnitude of the problem dawned on me, I realized that even though my available options were limited, I could at least do my best to document each case sent my way so that someone would bear witness to what had happened. Otherwise, the dead had no voice. Beyond knowing I had a duty to compile this list however, I was not sure what to do with it. Later after someone kindly helped launch this Substack, I decided to post it, it ended up being seen by a lot of people…and that is how I ended up writing here. Because of how long it took to verify each case, I realized that I had to end it a year in (at which point I knew of 45 individuals who had either critical or fatal injuries of a similar nature in close proximity to vaccination). Since that time, I still continue to hear reports I periodically document and discuss. For example, a good friend is a nurse in a cardiac unit and has told me many of the patients she sees now with heart failure are much younger than they were a few years ago. I previously advised her against getting the vaccine due to her history of rheumatic fever (a condition where the immune system attacks and damages part of the heart). This was because I had noticed both COVID-19 and especially its vaccine seemed to cause inflammatory flares at previous sites of injuries or inflammation (Lyme is also known for doing this). The vaccine also has a remarkably high rate of exacerbating pre-existing autoimmune conditions—such as the 24.2% rate found in a recent Israeli survey which is comparable to what a few colleagues have observed, and I suspect exacerbation of preexisting inflammation within the circulatory system, like what this study of 566 patients found, is a key mechanism behind vaccine deaths. A month ago, the nurse informed me that she had decided to vaccinate and had subsequently developed a heart condition. Additionally, she shared that the same had also happened to her mother following vaccination and that her sibling's partner is suffering longterm complication from a large stroke that immediately followed receiving a booster. Looking back on it, the thing I found the most disappointing about my own documentation project was that once it went viral, it should have triggered the drug regulators evaluating the vaccines to take preventative action. Instead, due to the meticulously planned campaign of mass censorship that we all found ourselves in, more red flags than I can count were ignored by the “very rigorous” vaccination surveillance systems that were allegedly ensuring there were no safety issues with these vaccines. Because of the immense power behind the medical-industrial complex, those debating this program have been stuck fighting an uphill battle. However, despite the immense degree of corruption, withholding of critical data, and censorship, these vaccines are dangerous enough that more and more evidence is nonetheless emerging of their danger, and the public is beginning to recognize it (e.g., consider how resistant the public has been to get COVID boosters). The previous article here discusses polling that shows this appears to be happening: The Forgotten Side of Medicine We Now Have A Clear Estimate Of The Rate Of Vaccine Injuries Throughout my entire life, I’ve always found that trying to argue against Big Business is like fighting with one or both hands tied behind your back because large industries can always co-opt and buy out every authoritative source on the subject, and then censor any inconvenient facts that still persist. This is an immensely challenging situation to be … Read more 9 days ago · 396 likes · 397 comments · A Midwestern Doctor Immediately after it was published, I was informed by a reader that possibly the most important dataset over the last two years was released today. For those interested, much of the context for today’s article can be found in the article above. German Data One of the depressing realizations one gains from studying the evidence-based literature is discovering how many issues exist within it and how difficult it is to know which data sources can be trusted. One of my favorite authors, Dr. Malcom Kendrick, devoted a book to addressing this subject and shared a pertinent anecdote for today’s events: “In truth, the figures on vaccine damage are exceedingly difficult to analyse, because causality is very difficult to prove on a case by case basis. However, when it comes to negative findings I always like to go to Germany. It has been demonstrated many times that the Germans are the most likely to report negative findings accurately. Yes I know, terrible racial stereotyping, but a fact is a fact. What do the Germans have to say on the matter? “Between 1978 and 1993 approx. 13,500 cases of undesired effects resulting from medications for vaccinations was reported to the Paul Ehrlich-Institute [PEI]…the majority was reported by the pharmaceutical industry. In 40% [5,400] of these cases the complications were severe, 10% [1,350] pertained to fatalities on account of effects.” Additionally, as I learned from Kendrick, since early 2001, the federal infection protection law has mandated that specific severe vaccine injuries be immediately reported directly to the PEI (Germany’s equivalent of the FDA for vaccines and biologics). The German’s list of reportable injuries is much broader than what I have seen acknowledged by many other countries (e.g., those which are possible to receive compensation for within the United States) and includes the previously discussed complications of DPT along with many of the reactions typically associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. However, while that historical trend exists, Germany has not been one of the best countries for reporting COVID vaccine injuries (which I suspect is due to the political direction their government has moved in). (The above graph illustrates why many of my German friends are not happy with their government) Because of their tradition of reporting adverse reactions to vaccination, Germans (or at least some of them) have been more resistant to toeing the party line on concealing the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines than citizens of many other countries (my friends there are enraged by the egregious concealment of critical safety data by the German government). In turn, some of the most critical vaccine data available comes from the German people as many of them have retained their intellectual integrity throughout the pandemic. For instance, although autopsies should always be conducted on those who died suspiciously after vaccination, due to the global climate of intimidation against conducting any type of research that challenges the COVID vaccine program, it is rarely done. Instead, almost every autopsy has been performed by a few brave pathologists in Germany, and I have tried to detail the pathologist’s work throughout my postings (e.g., see here). Some of the most important contributions of these autopsies include: •Demonstrating that there is highly unusual tissue inflammation in those who died after vaccination. Pathologists had not observed this phenomena before the COVID-19 vaccines, and stated the inflammation they observed would likely be fatal. •Demonstrating that the COVID spike protein could also be found in the tissues of those who died. •Demonstrating that another key part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not present, meaning that the only possible source of the spike protein was the vaccine. The most definitive study on this subject was recently completed. It examined 35 individuals who died within 20 days of vaccination, and after a lengthy examination excluded 10 who had a potential cause of death other than vaccination. Of the remaining 25, most had causes of death that frequently been linked to vaccination, and of those, 5 were found to have myocarditis potentially linked to the vaccine, and in 3 cases the vaccine was determined to be the definitive cause of their myocarditis and death. These results are very important for convicting the vaccines if it can also be proven that a large number of unexpected deaths are occurring following vaccination. The Religion of Data Every group needs to have some type of ideology to unite behind. Presently, one of the fixations within the Western world is on more and more data being the solution to everything. In turn, there are many concerns with this approach (e.g., it dehumanizes people, its “necessity” is used to justify violating citizen’s right to privacy while collecting it and it is being used to build an infrastructure that controls every aspect of our lives). Although data is often claimed to be our salvation, and I will admit sometimes is quite helpful, in many other cases, it fails abysmally to address our problems. A major reason for this failure is that no one wants to critically analyze data this is gathered if that data suggests we should stop supporting an entrenched financial interest. I am most aware of this in healthcare, as I know of numerous systems which were designed to analyze electronic medical records and either identify which pharmaceutical worked best for a condition, or if a pharmaceutical (or vaccine) was unsafe. Not surprisingly, all of these systems were never adopted, and the endless data we collect in healthcare (e.g., all the diagnostic coding data which medical insurance providers provide as a condition of reimbursement to healthcare providers) is rarely utilized to improve the public good. However, while prevailing biases frequently produces flawed analyses of data, data itself does not lie and has immense potential to expose dangerous health care practices if people are willing to look at it. The largest insurance provider in Germany, BKK, provides coverage to approximately 10.9 million Germans. A board member, Andreas Schöfbeck, observed some very concerning signs in their data, and unlike everyone else, had the courage to disclose it in a letter to the German government (e.g. he addressed the PEI), after which, he was dismissed from his position. The BKK dataset (discussed by Jessica Rose) was the one which showed 2.05% of vaccine recipients subsequently sought medical care with a healthcare provider (others estimated it demonstrated 3.5% were struggling with persistent vaccine side effects). This concerning safety signal prompted one German Political Party, the AFD (a controversial right wing party that has gained appeal through opposing the mandates) to file the German equivalent of FOIA for the rest of the insurance data (note: a few friends in Germany who are lifelong liberals joined AFD told me they believe “conservative” is a more appropriate label for AFD). Recently AFD obtained AOK Sachsen-Anhalt’s data, which once analyzed, demonstrated that many of the conditions we associate with COVID-19 injuries noticeably increased when the vaccination campaign initiated. According to this interview and Google translate, the conditions which rose five-fold or more were: AFD’s FOIA Request AFD also submitted a FOIA request to KBV, the association which represents all physicians who receive insurance in Germany and thus the largest insurance dataset available. The official response to their FOIA request reads as follows (this was my attempted translation): ”Dear Mr. Sichert, With an e-mail dated October 27th, 2022 you have submitted an application to the KBV after the Freedom of Information Act (IFG) on access to data of the diagnostic codes by law health-insured patients. You have asked for the following data packages to be sent by email: Package 1: Filtering of all insured persons who will have an ICD coding in 2021 had vaccine side effects. You have applied for the codes T88.1, T88.0, U12.9 and Y59.9 apply. Package 2: You request the transmission of a list of the frequency of all ICD codes of the insured persons from package 1 for the period 2016 to 2021, if proportionately available also for 2022, by quarter. The data query should after your request with V and G. Package 3: You request the transmission of a listing of the frequency of all ICD codes of all insured persons - without the number of insured persons from package 1 - for the period from 2016 to 2021, if proportionately available also for 2022 quarters. The data query should be done with V and G. The KBV corresponds to your application and includes a tabular overview as an attachment with the desired information about the frequency of at. The abbreviations used in the table have the following meaning: nw= number of patients with “vaccination side effects” (defined according to requested Filtering 1 in 2021) onws= patient numbers "without vaccination side effects" (defined according to requested Filtering 2 in 2021) Quarters of the reporting period are set as YYYYQ (e.g. 20214=Q4 2021). The small font size in the printout is again unavoidable, since we want to make it easier to compare wanted to show all quarters of the two comparison groups on one sheet (the pdf document). However, like last time, it can be enlarged. Today, the AFD hosted a press conference to unveil the data of those 72 million patients (the 90% of Germans with statutory health insurance) AFD had obtained from KBV. This data summarizes the number of times all ICD-10 (an international standard) diagnostic codes were used by German healthcare providers for these patients (outside of hospitals) from the first quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2022. Tom Lausen is a data activist who had previously revealed the PEI and the RKI (the German equivalent of the CDC) were concealing concerning vaccine safety data and was allowed to analyze both BKK and AOK’s data. For this presentation, Lausen was able to provide a preliminary summary of the KBV data a few days after it was released: A rough translation of this presentation can be found here (additionally YouTube now will translate the subtitles). If this video is deleted it can also be found here. A few of the points emphasized in this presentation include: •The PEI, the RKI and the German government have failed in their duty by federal law to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine injuries. Many of my friends and readers likewise believe they have done an atrocious job by attempting to conceal the vaccine injuries, and these agencies are frequently chastised by the German people for their conduct. Many of the arguments against the validity of this data must be viewed in the context of the fact it would be very easy to the government agencies to access and analyze this data, but despite many requests to over the last two years, they have all adamantly refused to, which is why AFD had to force them to act with its FOIA. •It is estimated that 90% of the suspicious deaths that occur after vaccination are not reported to the PEI, and approximately 90% of those reported come from the patient themselves or their relative (which again demonstrates that German healthcare providers are failing in their duty to report vaccine injuries). •The PEI has nonetheless received over 3,000 reports of suspicious deaths following vaccination, but has refused to perform any autopsies on those deaths. The excuse the PEI has used for their inaction is not having the explicit authority to order the autopsies (which is a spurious excuse). Fortunately as noted above, other groups without any official authority to order autopsies have nonetheless taken the initiative to perform them. For this press conference, a presentation was put together detailing Lausen’s preliminary findings and the correspondences with the regulatory agencies, all of which can be found here. To the best of my ability, I translated and slightly modified the key portions of the presentation so that they could be accessible to English speakers, but I am certain more will be translated in the upcoming days. The KBV Data All of the KBV data can be reviewed with a simple search tool here, although it does not seem to work for certain ICD-10 codes. Due to the importance of this data, for data preservation purposes, I am also providing a copy of the raw data the AFD received: This PDF file was supplied in a manner that makes the data quite difficult to analyze. Fortunately, one of my readers was able to move the above file into an easily sortable spreadsheet and thereby address some of the challenges with the PDF: Finally, the above sheet was sorted by that reader into a smart spreadsheet which allows you to easily observe which codes had the greatest increase in 2021-2022 (e.g. to sort them or create graphs). For those of you who are data inclined, you will likely want to create this sheet yourself, but for everyone else this is an excellent reference to start with). They were also able to use a script to put about one third of the names for the ICD-10 codes, but since there are fifteen thousand of them, it wasn’t practical for us to manually add in the rest and you will frequently need to directly look up the codes themselves (if a group wants to add the other codes in, I will be happy to repost that). When Lausen presented the data, for each time period (e.g., 2016 quarter 1), he chose to add two different values together (code_20161 and nocode_20161). As best as I can tell from reviewing the FOIA request and the provided data, these categories represent those who also received a vaccine injury code and those who did not (as a result the majority of Germans belong to the “nocode” category). I believe Lausen’s rationale for presenting the data in this manner was that a large number of vaccine injuries will go unreported and many vaccine injured patients are thus within the “nocode” category. Conversely, the total number of medical conditions observed in the country is not dependent upon accurate recognition of vaccine injuries. Separating the patients by (the somewhat inaccurately classified) vaccine injury status is nonetheless a helpful means for evaluating vaccine injuries (I saw a variety of interesting trends in my preliminary examination). However, for the reasons outlined in this article, for the initial spreadsheet presented below, those result are combined. Additionally, some of the extreme outliers exist because new ICD-10 codes are added each year and thus did not exist prior to 2021/2022. Finally, some of the codes you would expect to have large changes may not show in this dataset if they are codes typically used in a hospital setting as this dataset does not include hospital code submissions. In the coming days, I know many will use this data to verify our work identifying which codes in 2021-2022 had the greatest increase (you can also do that piece by piece with the already available tool), and then cross reference those to the increases reported in VAERS or other datasets. There is an immense amount to be ascertained here, and I believe it represents the credible evidence we have been looking for since the start of the pandemic to have an objective metric for quantifying the impact of vaccine injury. However, it is also critical we determine which of the observed trends are not due to artifacts within the data. This is probably the most important graph of Lausen’s presentation. We have all heard stories of individuals dying suddenly after vaccination (I’ve even read a report of an individual who appeared to be in good health making a thump in another room and being found dead shortly after by their spouse). This issue was recently brought to the public’s attention with Died Suddenly, a documentary that effectively brought attention to this issue, but also had factual errors which were counterproductive for persuading the public that this issue is real. However, while some of the proof that Died Suddenly provided to assert the existence of the sudden death phenomenon could not stand up to outside scrutiny, the same cannot be said of the KBV data. Additionally, one way that individuals have analyzed the unusual changes in health following the vaccination campaigns has been to assess how far they fall outside of the expected range of variation (this was also done for the final spreadsheet). I did a quick calculation for the above graph and found that 2021’s increase from 2016-2020 was 37.7σ, while 2022’s was 41.0σ. This is quite a big deal (the rarity of an event happening by chance increases exponentially as the σ increases). For context, a 7σ event has a 1/390,632,286,180 chance of spontaneously occurring (it is thought to occur once in a billion years), a 10σ event happens spontaneously once every 5.249e+020 years, and a 25σ event happens by chance every 1.309e+135 years (I was not able to find a reference on the probabilities for the even higher σ events observed here). Given these numbers, it is very difficult to argue that these events were not caused by something. In this regard, we are also quite fortunate that while the vaccines were rushed to the market over a period of time far too short to establish safety, that process still took a year. Because of this lag, it is possible to refute the reflexively cited counterargument that these changes were due to COVID-19 or the lockdowns, as these only occurred in 2020 (the only possible exception I can think of is that Delta emerged near the end of 2020, but the spike started well before Delta became prevalent in Europe later in 2021). This is a similar graph to the previous one, but include sudden cardiac death, which as many of you know also “unexpectedly” increased. Many authoritative sources have argued Lausen made a mistake to correlate vaccine injuries with the spike in sudden death because very few vaccines were given at the start of 2021 and thus if a correlation was there, it should have been not emerged until the second quarter. For context, this was the rate of COVID vaccination in Germany: As you can see, many vaccines were given in the first quarter of 2021. COVID-19 is not the only vaccination regularly received. For example in Germany in 2019, it was estimated that 39% of those 65 and older received an influenza vaccination. However, unlike previous vaccines, the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine caused far more people to require medical care for a vaccine side effect. Given that Germany has a longstanding practice of evaluating vaccine injuries, this graph makes a very important point. An actual increase in vaccine injuries is occurring and it is not a result of a bias leading to over-reporting; it is a result of the vaccines being dangerous and patients needing medical care for the injuries. Additionally, an outside team which looked at this data concluded approximately 5% of vaccine recipients subsequently required medical care, which is in line with the 7.7% discovered in V-Safe’s data and required a court order to be released as the CDC understandably did not wish to disclose this information. Note: I believe this discrepancy could be partially explained by the undercounting of vaccine codes highlighted in this article. The general correlation between these two datasets is important. V-safe monitored 10 million vaccine recipients for a few specific things and was arguably the best surveillance system in place for tracking the side effects of these vaccines as it had a large but defined sample who were provided an easy way to report the chosen side effects. Since one of its key metrics matches the KBV data, this argues that at least some of the KBV data is valid. Note: I am not sure if this specific dataset is referring to the total number of patients who sought care or the total number of times codes were submitted for vaccine injuries (which would mean a smaller number in total were injured). Given that there are thousands of ICD codes that I could search the database for (many other increases, such as those of certain cancers, were highlighted in Lausen’s presentation), I had to put some thought into which of those many increases would be the best to show for this article (there were a lot of compelling candidates). Previously, I proposed a model for the unusual fibrous clots observed in Died Suddenly that revolved around spike proteins causing protein misfolding. In support of this model, I highlighted an observed increase of an extremely rare protein misfolding disease which continues to be reported in VAERS. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease typically develop over years and occurs in approximately one in a million people annually, making its occurrence immediately after vaccination rare to the point that suggests causation (and as Jessica Rose noted, new reports are continuing to arrive in VAERS). The increase I proposed was a key point of contention for those who did not agree with my misfolded clot hypothesis, so I was eager to see if a current dataset could evaluate what was occurring. This increase is also quite large, and for all practical purposes impossible to have occurred by chance (although I will mention the authors who published the original case series linking COVID vaccination to 26 cases of CJD also determined that Delta appeared to have an increased capacity to trigger protein misfolding but I do not believe that can explain the above trend). Since this article was published, one reader has now attempted to present a longer analysis of this data which shows multiple interesting trends (e.g., many of the side effects commonly attributed to COVID vaccination appeared to have increased) along with raising additional questions about this data. It is my hope others will also do so! Citizen’s Substack Analysis of the recently published German insurance data A dataset listing ICD-10 disease codes for all insurance claims filed by German doctors (outside of hospitals) for publicly insured Germans from 2016–1Q22 was recently published (more information). I’ll start with the obvious charts: chest pain, myocarditis and pericarditis increased by 17.8%, 48.5% and 25%, respectively, in 1Q22 compared to 1Q19… Read more 4 days ago · 1 like · 2 comments · Citizen Scientist Finally, the presentation on the KBV data proposes a fatality rate for the COVID vaccines. This chart was compiled by Lausen from the officially reported adverse events to the vaccines and likely are significantly undercounting the vaccine fatality rate. Is This Data Valid? Following the AFD’s press conference, the leading medical research institute in Germany, ZI, acted as a third party to present a rebuttal of how AFD interpreted KBV’s data. I did not agree with their argument (that there results were an artifact of AFD also requesting for everyone who specifically died in 2021), but did note that their response acknowledged the authenticity of this data. The primary argument presented by ZI was that since the FOIA request selected for all patients who were vaccine injured in 2021-2022, the rise in deaths observed in 2021-2022 was simply due to the fact anyone who was vaccinated in 2021-2022 could not have died prior to 2021-2022 and thus the increase in deaths observed in 2021-2022 compared to what occurred prior to this time was due to the cohort effect. On the surface this seems like a credible way to dismiss anyone who would make such an elementary mistake and believe in this data. However, the German authorities have a long track record of attempting to cover up evidence of COVID vaccine harm (in addition to the points discussed above, the German government has been perpetually delaying releasing the death statistics for 2021), so these arguments require a critical evaluation. In turn, there is a few major issue with it: First, the “nocode” group should not suffer from the cohort effect and it was this group that comprised the majority of the increase in sudden deaths (review the wording of the FOIA request shown above). If the “code” group were to be removed (which potentially suffers from the cohort effect), an almost identical trend would still be present. Lausen presented his data by merging the code and nocode groups together which invalidated this counterargument, and I cannot see how a “cohort effect” is present in the combined data unless KBV failed to fulfill the FIOA in the manner that was requested (Lausen also subsequently provided an interview addressing the government criticisms of his analysis). An outside analyst also looked at this data and demonstrated that other fatal conditions (which should be vulnerable to same the cohort effect ZI is asserting) did not have the same 2021 spike: Second, the large σ found for many, (but by no means all) non-fatal conditions in the dataset indicates that something besides artifacts relating to time of death is causing the changes observed. I acknowledge that it is very possible some of the discrepancies present are due to not yet identified artifacts within the data, but at this point in time I have not been able to identify them. I believe that since KBV was focused on debunking the rise in sudden death codes, they did not focus on the rise in other codes for conditions associated with COVID vaccine injuries that were also observed. However, while this was not their focus, this point must nonetheless be considered since it does negate their counterargument. Additionally, The death argument ZI made was also inconsistent with the death codes in question nonetheless being reported prior to 2021, which they attributed to “coding errors or unaddressed billing fraud.” To some extent this is hand-waving that many others have contested (and something any type of auditing algorithm should have caught years before), but I do not believe it is as important as the first two points. Conversely, the strongest argument ZI put forward to establish that a cohort effect was occurring for the reported deaths was this spreadsheet. I have not yet been able to discern how the data in it was derived as it does not match the other things I looked at, so I cannot comment on if this is correct (an independent analyst arrived at the same conclusion I did). This spreadsheet is the one source of data that could refute AFD’s argument so I would greatly appreciate any additional thoughts on this one). However, I must also note that if this data is actually correct, it still does not negate the non-fatal complications of vaccination being observed. A German rebuttal of ZI’s arguments was posted here. AFD also discussed the above rebuttal in a thread here stating: "Hello all. The death-numbers that we have published are being hotly debated right now. Now the Central Institute for the KBV has joined in has said that the data we presented were quite easy to explain: 'The data is only for people who have accessed a medical service in 2021 and only such people had been billed and therefore would be in the data and everything in the years before are statistical runaways. There are also different causes of death that were significantly higher in the years before such as I46.9 (heart attack without successful reanimation). ' All together 104 000 people have been coded as deaths in the years 2016-2020 of whom the Central Institute of the KBV now says that they were billed medical services in 2021. Now we have a question: If this is really true, we demand an explanation from the Central Institute of the KBV how 104 000 persons that have died in the years 2016-2020 have been billed medical services in 2021.” [Translated courtesy of a reader] The following was also written in the tweet: “Allegedly, the figures from the KBV are only for patients with health insurance, for whom services were billed in 2021. However, the causes of death were coded for 104,000 patients in previous years. Do we have a data scandal or a billing scandal?” This table also refutes ZI’s argument that only those who were able to see a doctor and thus were alive in 2021 comprised the cohort of the insurance data. Many of the German commentators I saw online were also skeptical of the official rebuttals to this data. I was recently sent a detailed summary of the events after the press conference which demonstrated that the rationale for debunking the data changed as time went forward. As best as I can tell, no clear reason was presented for why Lausen’s analysis was flawed given. Instead it was insinuated either that Lausen incorrectly filtered the data (my team and others however arrived at the same results Lausen did) or that there was a data transmission error from the KBV (which is possible but would have had to have been deliberate or inconceivable incompetence). KBV also issued an astonishing statement refuting AFD’s presentation: The KBV board clarifies: Based on the billing data transmitted by the KBV to the AfD or. ICD-10 codes cannot be used to establish causal relationships between COVID-19 vaccinations and deaths. From the KBV's point of view, the increase in deaths shown in quarters I-IV 2021 and quarter I 2022 is largely pandemic-related mortality. This once again illustrates the importance of COVID 19 vaccination as an effective measure to prevent serious forms of progress up to deaths. Without the vaccination, mortality would probably have been much higher. This statement also cited the previously referenced ZI letter and another one which noted: •The codes in this database do not include codes entered on death certificates and thus cannot be assigned as the cause of death [however all of these codes cannot be entered unless the patient died; also as the statement above shows KBV is admitting an increase in deaths did occur]. •The codes in this database cannot be correlated with vaccination status because many people received the COVID vaccines in settings that did not result in codes being submitted and coding for COVID vaccination has not yet been included in the dataset due to special regulations [I agree with this point, but it fails to refute this dataset since Lausen chose to combine the code and nocode groups; instead, it simply argues that vaccine injuries are underreported in this dataset]. •This database was not created for the purpose of conducting medical research and therefore no conclusion can be drawn from it [I don’t believe this is a valid argument; a lot can be inferred from it and it is the best available database we have, so until the government chooses to make a better database available, it is “the evidence.” Additionally, this is a very similar argument to what is said for VAERS, but unlike VAERS there is not an over or underreporting issue present with this dataset]. I do not believe any of the above points refute the sudden increases in submitted billing codes (hypothesized to correlate with vaccine injuries) that occurred a year after the pandemic started at the exact same time the vaccination campaign began. However, I also believe some type of not yet identified artifact could account for at least some of what was observed and I have spent the last week revising this article to account for the additional information I come across. If anyone can provider a stronger refutation of the data presented here (preferably, at the pinned comment), I would greatly appreciate it. We need to help each other stay honest and I will gladly retract this article if a critical mistake was made. Note: An independent analyst who reviewed the entire dataset found that it showed many other signs of being plausible. Conclusion Given the extremely concerning implications of the German data, it is not surprising that governments around the world and healthcare systems or insurance providers have been reluctant to release their own data. It is my sincere hope that this release will open the flood gates to additional disclosures and I am in complete agreement with the conclusion of this presentation: I wish we had an American political party stating the same. There are signs of hope however; today Ron DeSantis did something incredible and requested a grand jury against Pfizer and Moderna, an essential step a few leaders in our movement have been working to lay the groundwork for over the last two years. I am also hopeful that this grand jury will compel the state of Florida to release similar data that can be used to assess the safety of these vaccines. I strongly encourage those of you who who are able to begin looking through the KBV dataset and identifying important trends that can be correlated to other observations we have made over the last two years. I believe there are many excellent articles that could be written on them. I sincerely thank all of you for your continued support! My primary goal is to draw attention to this data so numerous independent parties can objectively analyze it and independently verify if the trends it shows correlate to “controversial” increases observed in other datasets like VAERS. This data is extremely important as it is the only access we have ever been given to observe the changes in illness that follow the COVID vaccination campaigns. I also suspect the most important use of this data will be to establish causality for specific vaccine injuries. This matters because typically when someone suffers a pharmaceutical injury, it is not acknowledged by the the government and the courts because “there is no evidence the product is associated with that injury,” and as you might expect, the pharmaceutical industry work tirelessly to make sure the evidence that could implicate their product never emerges. At this point I’ve lost track of how many sad instances I’ve seen where this happened to a medically injured patient (in some cases to the point the gaslighted victim gives up and ends their lives), so I greatly support having an independent means to assess causality for vaccine injuries. Those injured by the COVID-19 vaccines are profoundly suffering and they really need help (on the bright side however, recently Senator Johnson and shortly after Governor DeSantis gave a voice to these victims). Postscript: It appears a similar rise in unexplained deaths is occurring in Canada. SOURCE: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the

This is Not On The Beeb's 72nd report publishing the translation of the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The stats are collated up to the 23rd of November but are released to the public a week later, so in this case on the 1st of December. It then takes the NOTB contributors a further few days to sift through and publish our report. MHRA: People in UK who have received one or more dose of a C19 vaccine = 53,813,491 (Up to 11th Sept 2022) UK population 68,760,539 Percentage of people jabbed with the experimental 'vaccine' = 78% TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 94.4 (83.2m last month) AZ 49.16m (49.16 m last month) Moderna 25.3m Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports 177,925 (Pfizer) 246,866 (AZ) 47,045 (Moderna) 52 (Novavax = N) 2130 (Unknown) TOTAL = 474,018 people impacted incl. bivalent vaccines (increase of 3,995 in 4 weeks) BOOSTERS All boosters = 64,259,700 • Pfizer - 32.5m (mono) & 9.7m (bivalent) • Astrazeneca - 59,700 • Moderna - 13.1m (mono) & 8.9m (bivalent) Booster Yellow Card Reports 35,028 (Pfizer) 655 (AZ) 21,956 (Moderna) 280 (Unknown) TOTAL = 57,919 BREAKDOWN Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death Pfizer- 177,925 (175,426 last month) AZ. - 246,866 (246,638 last month) Moderna 47,045. (45,946 last month) Novavax 52 (68 last week!) 474,018 people impacted incl. bivalent vaccines (increase of 3,995 in 4 weeks) TOTAL = 464,072 incl. bivalent vaccines (an increase of 5951 or 1.28% over 5 weeks) Overall 1-in-114 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 114 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Fatal Pfizer 857 (844 last month) AZ 1334 (1,327 last month) Moderna 111 (104 last month) Unknown 60 (55 last month) TOTAL = 2362. (2,330 last month) Blood Disorders - 17,677 (Pfizer) + 7938 (AZ) + 2862 (Moderna) + 75 (Unknown) = 28,552 Anaphylaxis - 687 (Pfizer) + 888 (AZ) + 102 (Moderna) + 2 (N) + 3 (Unknown) = 1682 Acute Cardiac - 14,375 (Pfizer) + 11,813 (AZ) + 4177 (Moderna) + 5 (N) + 161 (Unknown) = 30,531 Eye Disorders - 8461 (Pfizer) + 15,107 (AZ) + 1939 (Moderna) + 105 (Unknown) = 25,612 Blindness - 180 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 46 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 561 Deafness - 331 (Pfizer) + 447 (AZ) + 70 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 854 Infections - 13,600 (Pfizer) + 20,951 (AZ) + 3160 (Moderna) + 5 (N) + 263 (Unknown) = 37,979 Herpes - 2341 (Pfizer) + 2725 (AZ) + 363 (Moderna) + 2 (N) + 30 (Unknown) = 5461 Spontaneous Abortions - 505 + 19 stillbirths/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 240 + 6 stillbirths/foetal deaths (AZ) + 74 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) +11 (Unknown) = 830 miscarriages Gastrointestinal Disorders - 44,248 (Pfizer) + 81,396 (AZ) + 13,828 (Moderna) + 6 (N) + 506 (Unknown) = 139,984 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 878 (Pfizer) + 2429 (AZ) + 108 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 27 (Unknown) = 3443 Nervous System Disorders - 84,728 (Pfizer) + 184,225 (AZ) + 24,827 (Moderna) + 16 (N) + 1088 (Unknown) = 294,884 Seizures - 1201 (Pfizer) + 2113 (AZ) + 340 (Moderna) + 34 (Unknown) = 3688 Paralysis - 553 (Pfizer) + 916 (AZ) + 148 (Moderna) + 15 (Unknown) = 1632 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4426 (Pfizer) + 6935 (AZ) + 925 (Moderna) + 56 (Unknown) = 12,342 Respiratory Disorders - 23,064 (Pfizer) + 30,230 (AZ) + 5592 (Moderna) + 3 (N) + 279 (Unknown) = 59,168 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1148 (Pfizer) + 2307 (AZ) + 240 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3707 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,798 (Pfizer) + 18,699 (AZ) + 3025 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 158 (Unknown) = 32,681 Skin Disorders - 35,879 (Pfizer) + 53,819 (AZ) + 15,036 (Moderna) + 7 (N) + 464 (Unknown) = 105,205 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,789 (Pfizer) + 20,983 (AZ) + 5438 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 271 (Unknown) = 58,482 Bell’s Palsy - 677 (Pfizer) + 646 (AZ) + 127 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 3 (Unknown) = 1454 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,200,000 children (1st doses) + 2,900,000 (2nd doses) + 400,000(mono)/52,500(bivalent) boosters resulting in 4205 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,400 children (1st doses) + 8.500 (2nd doses) + ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 267 Yellow Cards (reporting rate 1-in-43) • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) + 2000 (2nd doses) + 32,400(mono)/1000(bivalent) boosters resulting in 39 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 37 Yellow Cards Total = 4,213,700 children injected (under 18s) Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,609,900 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4548 For full reports including 387 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

STORY AT-A-GLANCE September 29, 2021, Google deleted my YouTube account for “violating community guidelines” they’d implemented that same morning September 28, 2022, I filed a lawsuit against Google, YouTube and Alphabet Inc. for breach of contract. YouTube unilaterally amended the contract without notice, which is a violation of its own terms, and then used this last-minute amendment to remove my content YouTube’s terms of service also include a “three strikes” policy, where users are supposed to be given three warnings and opportunities to remove content that violates the guidelines BEFORE being banned. I had no “strikes” against my channel on the day I was deplatformed and deleted We’re also suing YouTube for unjust enrichment, as for the last 16 years, my video content, having generated in excess of 50 million views, has been of great financial benefit to YouTube, allowing them to increase advertising revenue on the site November 8, 2021, I sued U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both in her official and personal capacities, for violating my First Amendment rights, as she tried to force Amazon.com to ban my book, “The Truth About COVID-19” September 29, 2021, Google deleted my YouTube account for “violating community guidelines” — guidelines they’d implemented that very same morning. September 28, 2022, I filed a lawsuit1 against Google, YouTube and Alphabet Inc. for breach of contract.2 As detailed in my complaint, YouTube unilaterally amended the contract without notice, which is a violation of its own terms, and then used this last-minute amendment to remove my content, which went back to 2005, the same year YouTube was founded. At the time YouTube deleted my content, I had more than 300,000 subscribers, and my videos had collectively garnered more than 50 million views. While I disagreed with YouTube’s censorship, when its “COVID-19 misinformation” policy was implemented back in April 2021, I carefully avoided posting any content on YouTube that might violate that guideline. In fact, over 16 years on the platform, I never once received notice of any “strike” against my channel for violation of community guidelines. Clear Breach of Contract Then, on the morning of September 29, 2022, at 9 a.m. EDT, The Washington Post published an article titled “YouTube Is Banning Joseph Mercola and a Handful of Other Anti-Vaccine Activists.” According to the WaPo: “YouTube is taking down several video channels associated with high-profile anti-vaccine activists including Joseph Mercola ... As part of a new set of policies aimed at cutting down on anti-vaccine content on the Google-owned site. YouTube will ban any videos that claim that commonly used vaccines approved by health authorities are ineffective or dangerous. The company previously blocked videos that made those claims about coronavirus vaccines, but not ones for other vaccines like those for measles or chickenpox.” Six minutes AFTER the publication of that WaPo article, at 9.06 a.m. EDT, I received an email from YouTube informing me that my entire channel had been deplatformed and banned. They didn’t just take down old videos where I discussed vaccines. They took down my whole channel, including thousands of videos that were completely unrelated to vaccines. So, as described in my complaint, the evidence suggests YouTube had considered this new guideline for some time — to not allow disparaging views against ANY approved vaccine — and they worked with a reporter from The WaPo to create that article ahead of time. The WaPo article was then embargoed until the morning of September 29 in order to not allow me (or anyone else affected by this change) to review the new policy, take steps to bring my channel into compliance, or move my content to another platform. Instead, they simply deleted 16 years’ worth of intellectual property, without warning. This is a clear violation of its own terms of service, which state that YouTube “will provide reasonable advance notice” of any changes to the terms of service, and that users will have “the opportunity to review them” and to remove content if they do not agree to the new terms. Government, Media and Social Media Collude to Censor The WaPo article coinciding with YouTube’s action is also a blatant illustration of how government, social media platforms and media collude and coordinate attacks to censor people and organizations with whom they do not agree, or who pose a threat to their propaganda narrative. In a September 29, 2021, “News & Events” article posted by YouTube on its website, YouTube admitted they were “working closely with health authorities,” including “local and international health organizations” to come up with this new guideline. YouTube Violated Its Own Three Strikes Policy YouTube’s terms of service also include a “three strikes” policy, where users are supposed to be given three warnings and opportunities to remove content that violates the guidelines BEFORE being banned. I had no “strikes” against my channel on the day I was deplatformed and deleted. The fact that YouTube had to use underhanded tactics to create an excuse to get rid of us only goes to show how compliant we had actually been all along. YouTube Profited From the Content It Stole I’m also suing YouTube for unjust enrichment, as for the last 16 years, my video content, having generated in excess of 50 million views, has been of great financial benefit to YouTube, allowing them to increase advertising revenue on the site. Additionally, they’ve refused to allow me to retrieve any of this content, which they still have in their possession. So, YouTube has unjustly benefited at my expense. Sen. Elizabeth Warren Sued for First Amendment Violation The YouTube lawsuit isn’t the only legal complaint we’ve filed to protect our rights in this new age of illegal censorship. November 8, 2021, I, along with Ronnie Cummins, founder and director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) and the coauthor of my best-selling book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” our publisher, Chelsea Green Publishing, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who wrote our foreword, also sued U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both in her official and personal capacities, for violating our First Amendment rights. The lawsuit was filed in response to Warren’s attempts to force Amazon.com to ban our book. In early September 2021, Warren sent a letter3 to Andy Jassy, chief executive officer of Amazon, demanding an “immediate review” of Amazon’s algorithms to weed out books peddling “COVID misinformation,” stressing that Amazon’s sale of such books was “potentially unlawful.”4,5,6 While she didn’t spell out what laws Amazon might be breaking, she appeared to be warning Jassy that the company may be held legally responsible for wrongful death and homicide by selling books that “misinform” readers about COVID-19, its treatment and COVID shots. She singled out my book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” as a prime example of “highly-ranked and favorably-tagged books based on falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccines and cures” that she wanted banned. She wrote:7 “Dr. Mercola has been described as ‘the most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online. Not only was this book the top result when searching either ‘COVID-19’ or ‘vaccine’ in the categories of ‘All Departments’ and ‘Books’; it was tagged as a ‘Best Seller’ by Amazon and the ‘#1 Best Seller’ in the ‘Political Freedom’ category. The book perpetuates dangerous conspiracies about COVID-19 and false and misleading information about vaccines. It asserts that vitamin C, vitamin D and quercetin … can prevent COVID-19 infection … And the book contends that vaccines cannot be trusted ...” Government Officials Cannot Legally Censor Anyone As a government official, it is illegal for Warren to violate the U.S. Constitution, and pressuring private businesses to do it for her is not a legal workaround. As noted in our complaint: “Once upon a time, the First Amendment was understood to guarantee that books challenging governmental orthodoxy could be sold without fear of governmental intimidation or reprisal. Almost sixty years ago, in Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963), the Supreme Court held that state officials violated the First Amendment by sending letters to booksellers warning that the sale of certain named books was potentially unlawful. The ‘vice’ in such letters and in the ‘veiled threat’ of legal repercussions they communicated, explained the Court, is that they allow government to achieve censorship while doing an end-run around the judiciary, ‘provid[ing] no safeguards whatever against the suppression of ... constitutionally protected’ speech, thus effecting an unconstitutional ‘prior restraint.’ It made no difference that the officials who sent the letter lacked the ‘power to apply formal legal sanctions’ — i.e., that the officials did not themselves have the power to sanction or prosecute the booksellers in any way. Indeed this fact made the unconstitutionality more apparent. The officials ‘are not law enforcement officers; they do not pretend that they are qualified to give or that they attempt to give distributors only fair legal advice ... [T]hey acted ... not to advise but to suppress.’ It also made no difference, the Court expressly found, that the letters were framed as mere ‘exhort[ation]’ or that the booksellers were in theory ‘free’ to ignore the letters, because the officials had ‘deliberately set about to achieve the suppression of publications deemed ‘objectionable’,’ and ‘people do not lightly disregard public officers’ veiled threats.’ Today, certain members of the United States Congress have apparently forgotten, or think they are above, the law set forth in Bantam Books.” If We Lose Free Speech, We Lose Everything There’s no doubt our book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is constitutionally protected speech, and that Warren’s letter is calling on Amazon to suppress protected speech. Yet, ever since the start of the pandemic, government has systematically sought to suppress the kind of information shared in our book, using the same tactic as Warren used against us here — warning internet-based companies that if they don’t censor these views, the full weight of the government’s wrath will be turned against them. While lawsuits like these are time consuming and costly, they are necessary. Free speech is worth fighting for, because if we lose that, then we lose everything. As discussed in “The Biggest Casualty of COVID-19,” individual rights have been repeatedly trampled and violated ever since the beginning of this pandemic, and it’s only going to get worse from here if we don’t fight back. It’s now clear that we have only two choices: Freedom, or life under authoritarian rule. There’s no middle ground. As the old adage goes, “Give an inch and they’ll take a mile.” It’s true that the judicial system has in many ways been weaponized against us as well, but it is still our best chance at setting the record straight and reining in these egregious rights violations. SOURCE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/10/15/mercola-sues-google-youtube.aspx?