Opinion piece
Well, it was a big day in the USA yesterday
Back in 2021 it was hard to imagine a president to quote:
“reinstate any service members who were unjustly expelled from our military for objecting to the coronavirus vaccine mandate — with full back pay.”
Trump has announced that he will sign an executive order to
“immediately stop all government censorship and bring back free speech to America. Never again will the immense power of the state be weaponised to persecute political opponents,” he said. “Something I know something about.”
Unsurprisingly, but still great news, Trump has pulled The USA out of the WHO
RFK, TRUMP & JFK?
We are all watching RFK's moves on the CDC and childhood vaccine schedule. However, even though I've spent eleven years fighting the same, I'm maybe more excited by the promised release of the JFK files under executive order.
JFK coined the term 'conspiracy' in relation to the actions of the deep state. The three letter agencies have since done well to twist and use this term as an insult to try and isolate the insightful from the blind.
The potential for the full circle of JFK's true story being revealed, in turn blowing the lid of all conspiracy theories would be divine justice.
Many realise JFK was assassinated by US government insiders. However, if Dr Jack Kruse is right, and I suspect he is, the truth about Lee Harvey Oswald is enough to prise the eyes of the deepest sleepers open. Apparently, Lee Harvey Oswald was a CIA assassin being trained to take out Castro. As an insider and a JFK supporter, he blew the whistle on a prior assassination plan, saving JFK's life. The revenge was simple. While enacting assassination plan #2 in Dallas, they stitched up whistleblowing Oswald as the killer.
As he repeatedly claimed, "I'm just a patsy"
If this is true and its all revealed within any release (yes, a truly full unreacted release sounds unlikely) the wake up call could be 100X the effect of people realising the impossibility of two planes bringing down three towers during 911.
Fact checkers on the retreat?
Just after New Year, we had the pleasure of watching Mark Zuckerberg on the Rogan show mumble humble pie as he desperately tried to switch sides from King of the fact-checking censors to "honest guv, it was all just a fact-checking experiment that went too far."
It was interesting to see how he blamed the fact-checking on overzealous third party checkers and media pressure (!) claiming he had little control over the finer details of Meta's policy, yet later in the interview, he described very clearly the precise control he has over the board of Meta. These contradictions highlight the genius of Rogan's three hour interviews, relaxing the guard and loosening tongues.
Is the age of fact checking over? From personal experience, I used to get over 2,000 shares on my Facebook live feeds and now struggle to get a dozen to see my posts, even with 5,000 'friends' and as many followers. This proves fact-checkers are little but a superficial distraction and little more than sacrificial scapegoats to offer to the gods of free speech, whereas the real censorship lies at the programming level, deeply embedded within the algorithms.
The theatre of banning and reinstating TikTok over fears of security risks (Tiktok having copied the idea of FB's data gathering) reminds us that just as the power within a democracy lies with the person counting the votes and not the voter, the same applies to all social media. He who writes and maintains the algorithm is the 'editor' with far-reaching and seemingly invisible powers. And he who mines the data, gains the knowledge that enables the most profound analysis enabling the most effective strategy on all decisions - not just marketing.
MUSK
Sadly, we are seeing censorship within 'X' that appears to have been triggered by little more than someone challenging Musk's ideas. Back in 2016/2017, I was trying to initiate a censor-free platform, but when you delve deep and road test systems, it appears to be practically impossible. There are always cases when some form of editorial control are needed, and with that control, abuse of that power is always going to happen.
For now, it appears the best way is to simply watch and highlight censorship, embarrassing champions of free speech into honouring their pre-tantrum ideals.
Yes, Musk reads comments under his posts.
Yes, he can be swayed.
Like all humans, he too wants to be loved and respected.
Back to Trump.
The next few weeks are going to be more than fascinating.
Let's remember: love, hate, or distrust him, actions speak louder than words, promises, or hyperbole.
Trump made big mistakes championing the C19 rollout that killed and maimed many, and I find it hard to forget.
We knew, so why didn't he?
He's blamed a lot of his bad decisions on the previous poor choice of close advisors. Many a king has been brought down by the wrong person whispering in their ear.
As they say, everyone deserves a second chance.
And Trump has his.
I'll personally be watching his moves to stop the genocide in Gaza just as much as watching him move on the C19 genocide.
The US leaving the WHO is a great start.
Fingers crossed.
When I see what you write here, Mark, and with great respect, not because I know the real truth behind all these criminals' crimes and the political game in detail, but because there is something seriously wrong in the world, and it's nothing new, the lies are countless, and then I come to my point: who runs this 'work'?
I would want to believe in salvation if I didn't know it kills my biological self-regulation mechanisms.
I have warned Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in a review of RFK's candidacy in a debate on Children's Health Defense; if democracy worked, was the best for humanity, those who control you and other heads of state, Mr. Global and the elite would never…